• All the pleasures of the Garden

ALL THE PLEASURES OF THE GARDEN

~ What is ordinary to some is extraordinary to others

ALL THE PLEASURES OF THE GARDEN

Category Archives: AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S

On this Day in History: 28 JUNE

28 Sunday Jun 2020

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in 16th CENTURY ART, 17TH CENTURY ART, 18TH CENTURY ART, 19TH CENTURY ART, 20TH CENTURY ART, 21st CENTURY ART, ACTING, AMERICAN DRAMA, AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, AMERICAN HISTORY, ART, Australia, AUSTRALIAN THEATRE, DIRECTORS, DRAMA, ENGLISH HISTORY, HISTORY, POLITICS, THEATRE, Uncategorized, UNITED KINGDOM, USA

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ART, CINEMA, EVENTS, FILM, HISTORY, MOVIES, PHOTOGRAPHY, TRAVEL, USA

1edd92fa32b1c36b83c391913012ed6c

The 28th June is a rather unique day in regards to World History and in particular ‘Western’ History. It marks the anniversary as well as birthdays of certain events and people that had considerable impact on the future and the present. The following are just   some that occurred on 28 June.

1. Coronation of EDWARD IV (1442-1483), King of England – Westminster Abbey, London, 1461. The coronation of Edward IV, eldest son Richard, Duke of York, and brother to George, Duke of Clarence and Richard, Duke of Gloucester (later Richard III), marked the end of the first part of the so-called ‘Wars of the Roses’ between the Houses of York and Lancaster. Edward IV reigned from 1461-1470 until the Lancastrian forces rose in rebellion and re-instated Henry VI. The Battle of Tewksbury in 1471 saw the defeat of the House of Lancaster and Edward IV retook the crown, reigning until 1483.

220px-George_Plantagenet,_Duke_of_Clarence
48-Opener-montage_credits_Alamy-Philip-Mould-Company-Getty-Images-74fb02d
Belagerung_von_Calais_1346-1347

2. The birth of HENRY VIII (1491-1547) – Placentia Palace, Greenwich, Kent. Henry VIII was the third child of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. His subsequent reign after his father’s death in 1509 was one of the most turbulent and influential in English history. Controversial not just because of his family – his six wives and father to Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, but also because of the split with Rome and the Catholic Church and the creation of the Protestant Church of England.

38e37247ad481b7bc66f6a43ca3a554e
Henry-VIII-oil-panel-artist-National-Portrait
440px-After_Hans_Holbein_the_Younger_-_Portrait_of_Henry_VIII_-_Google_Art_Project

3. The birth of CHARLES V (1519-1556) Holy Roman Emperor, King of Germany and Italy – Prinsenof, Ghent, Holy Roman Empire. One of the most dynamic and powerful rulers of Europe in the 16th Century, and the person who firmly established the House of Hapsburg as a major force in ‘World History’. Throughout his life Charles V fought many battles mainly on behalf of Catholicism. His enemies were not only the European Protestant states but also the Ottoman Turks.

440px-Barend_van_Orley_-_Portrait_of_Charles_V_-_Google_Art_Project
440px-Elderly_Karl_V
Jakob_Seisenegger_001

4. The BATTLE OF NAGASHINO (1575) – Nagashino Castle, Mikawa, Honshu, Japan. The Battle of Nagashino was one of the decisive battles in the Sengoku period (1467-1615) between Okudaira Sadamasa of the Tokugawa Shogunate and Takeda Katsuyori of the Takeda clan. Okudaira Sadamasa managed to defend the Nagashino Castle from considerable attacks until relief arrived from the Tokugawa-Oda alliance.

500px-Sengoku_period_battle
440px-Tokugawa_Ieyasu2_full
440px-Takeda_Katsuyori
440px-Battle_of_Nagashino

5. The birth of SIR PETER PAUL RUBENS (1577-1640) – Siegen Nassau-Dillenburg, Holy Roman Empire. One of the most influential (and wealthiest) painters of the Baroque period of Art. Rubens worked as a painter as well as a diplomat. Most of his art work, however, is devoted to historical, mythical, and religious event and people.

images-2
Rubens
the-tiger-hunt-rubens
440px-Sir_Peter_Paul_Rubens_-_Portrait_of_the_Artist_-_Google_Art_Project

6. The birth of JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU (1712-1778) – Geneva, Republic of Geneva. Rousseau is on of the most influential philosophers of the 18th Century. His major works include Emile, or on Education (1762), The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right (1762), and Confessions (1770). Rousseau’s work was considerably influential on the Jacobins during the French Revolution. His work and philosophy continues to be studied today. Always controversial, it was the British philosopher Bertrand Russell who stated, ‘Hitler is the outcome of Rousseau’.

703671151-Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-Quotes
jean-jacques-rousseau-25573
the-world-of-reality-has-its-limits-the-world-of-imagination-is-boundless-quote-1
440px-Jean-Jacques_Rousseau_(painted_portrait)
11a94870b31d7ee74a4c7dd09e2e3-_mg_8910
274242-Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-Quote-At-sixteen-the-adolescent-knows-about
images

7. Coronation of QUEEN VICTORIA (1812-1901) – Westminster Abbey, 1838.

mw06506
256454-1330622844
Coronation_of_Queen_Victoria_28_June_1838_by_Sir_George_Hayter
440px-Queen_Victoria_by_Bassano

8. The premier of the ballet GISELLE, or THE WILLIS by Adolph Adam, Theophile Gautier, Jules-Henri Vernoy de Saint-Georges – in Paris, France 1841. Giselle is one of the most popular and enduring classical ‘romantic’ ballets. It was based on two sources – Heinrich Heine’s De I’Allemage and Victor Hugo’s ‘Fantomes’ (Les Orientales). The ballet was created for Carlotta Grisi, an Italian dancer and one of the most popular ‘stars’ of European ballet in 19th Century.

350px-Giselle_C_Grisi_as_Giselle_1842
440px-Giselle_-Carlotta_Grisi_-1841_-2

9. The death of ROBERT O’HARA BURKE (1821-1861) – Coopers Creek, Queensland, Australia, 1861. Burke’s death at Cooper’s Creek in 1861 marked the end of the disastrous and tragic ‘Burke and Wills Expedition’ whose aim was to cross the Australian continent from Melbourne to the Gulf of Carpentaria. Launched with much patriotic sentiment and celebration, departing from Melbourne 20 August 1860 with about 15,000 spectators, the expedition was a complete disaster. Despite Burke and his companions, including William John Wills, making it to the Gulf of Carpentaria they did not have enough provisions nor understanding of the harsh realities of the Australian outback. Burke and Wills and Dennis King made it back to Cooper’s Creek only to discover that their depot party had left the previous day. Burke and Wills died at Cooper’s Creek, however, King managed to survive thanks to the assistance of a local Indigenous tribe.

440px-John_Longstaff_-_Arrival_of_Burke,_Wills_and_King,_1861
Robert_O'Hara_Burke
p1030111
Unknown
William_Strutt_-_The_Burial_of_Burke,_1911

Unknown.jpeg10. The birth of LUIGI PIRANDELLO (1867-1936) – Girgenti (now, Agigento), Sicily, Italy. Pirandello is one of the masters and major influencers of 20th Century theatre. This includes his extraordinary plays – Right You Are, If You Think So (1917), The Rules of the Game (1918) Six Characters in Search of and Author (1921), and Henry IV (1922).

11. The capture of NED KELLY (1854-1880) – Glenrowan, Victoria, Australia, 1880. Ned Kelly remains one of the most iconic and controversial Australian ‘bushrangers’ of the 19th Century. The siege of the Glenrowan Inn, Glenrowan, involving Ned and his fellow gang members, as well as the Victorian police and locals was bloody affair. In the morning of 28 June 1880 Ned put on his iconic armour and left the Glenrowan Inn, leaving his companions behind. Ned Kelly confronted the police, which included journalist Tom Carrington who later wrote that when Ned Kelly appeared for the final confrontation it was like a ‘strange apparition’ – ‘With the steam rising from the ground it looked like for all the world like the ghost of Hamlet’s father….It was the most extraordinary sight I ever saw or read in my life, and I felt fairly spellbound with wonder, I could not stir or speak’.

440px-Ned_Kelly_capture
440px-Ned_Kelly_in_1880
440px-A_strange_apparition_Ned_Kelly's_last_stand

11. The birth of RICHARD RODGERS (1902-1979) – Queens, New York City, USA. One of the masters of American Music Theatre, Richard Rodgers will collaborators Lorenz Hart and later Oscar Hammerstein II created some of the most popular and enduring American musicals of the 20th Century. This includes – (w. Lorenz Hart) On Your Toes (1936), Babes in Arms (1937), The Boys from Syracuse (1938), Pal Joey (1940-41); (w. Oscar Hammerstein II) Oklahoma (1943), Carousel (1945), South Pacific (1949), The King and I (1951), The Sound of Music (1959).

440px-Rodgers_and_Hart_NYWTS
440px-Rodgers
Rodgers_and_Hammerstein_at_piano-original

12. The Assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand (1863-1914) and his wife Sophie, Duchess of Hohenburg (1868-1914) – Sarajvo, Austria-Hungary, 1914. The assassination of ‘heir presumptive’ to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, Arch Duke Ferdinand and his wife Sophie, is generally cited as the ’cause celeb’ that triggered a series of events that led to World War I.

faw1
440px-Ferdinand_Schmutzer_-_Franz_Ferdinand_von_Österreich-Este,_um_1914
ScreenShot2017-12-15at3.07.19PM-5a342bc8eb4d5200379049ec
307c532ea9f63914f4950aa88cd4ed8e

13. The signing of the TREATY OF VERSAILLES – Versailles, France, 1919. The signing of the Treaty of Versailles on 28 June 1919 officially marked the end of World War I and hostilities between Germany and the Allied Powers of Great Britain, France, and the USA.

ART16770
1*LmchG8tUlLaqnMNRyDoOZA
images
treaty-of-versailles-gettyimages-544274844

14. The birth of MEL BROOKS (1926- ) – Brooklyn, New York City, USA. One of the greatest American clowns, comedy writer and director of the 20th Century – who is still alive today. His many films include – The Producers (1967), Blazing Saddles (1974), and Young Frankenstein (1974). My favourite? The Producers (1967).

maxresdefault
440px-Mel_Brooks

 

There is a lot more – but – ‘Here endeth the lesson’ – Happy 28 June.

Tony Knight – 28 June, 2020.

MUSICALS: FILM: Deep In My Heart (1954) – Sigmund Romberg

14 Thursday Sep 2017

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in 20TH CENTURY ART, ACTING, ACTORS, AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, BROADWAY, DIRECTORS, DRAMA, FILM, HISTORY, Hollywood, MOVIES, MUSICALS, PEOPLE, PLAYS, THEATRE, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1950s, ACTING, ACTORS, BROADWAY, CINEMA, DRAMA, FILM, FILMS, Hollywood, MGM MUSICALS, MOVIES, MUSICALS, PLAYS, SIGMUND ROMBERG, THEATRE, USA

downloadSigmund Romberg (1887-1951) is now a relatively neglected musical theatre artist; and yet, once upon a time, particularly in the 1920s, he was amongst the most celebrated of Broadway musical composers The film Deep in My Heart (1954), directed by film musical master Stanley Donen, is a Hollywood ‘musical bio-pic’ based on the life of Sigmund Romberg.

The ‘bio-pic’ is a sub-genre of filmic ‘historical drama’, which remains the primary genre in world cinema. One only has to look at the respective film awards from across the world to clearly see that most ‘Best Film’ awards have gone to ‘historical drama’ films. The musical ‘bio-pic’ is curious genre, wildly different in form and structure. Some attempt to cover and entire life of a particular musical artists, and some focus only part. A number of ‘musical bio-pics’ are based on successful theatre musicals, others are original film works, In all cases, however, the popular ‘hits’ of this artist is interweaved into the narrative – sometimes successfully, sometimes not. Part of this challenge involves whether or not the particular song advances the narrative, and/or reveals something specific about the artist.

220px-Yankee_Doodle_Dandy_poster
190px-The_Jolson_Story_-_1946_Poster
190px-Jolson_Sings_Again_-_1949_Poster

The most successful original works include Michael Curtiz’s Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942) which is based on the life of Broadway artist George M, Cohan, and brilliantly portrayed by James Cagney; Alfred E. Green’s The Jolson Story (1946) and Henry Levin’s  Jolson Sings Again (1949) with Larry Parks as Al Jolson.

220px-Lady_sings_the_blues
Coal_miners_daughter
Topsy_Turvy

In more modern times there are Sidney J. Furie’s Lady Sings the Blues (1972) about Billie Holiday, beautifully played by Diana Ross; Michael Apted’s Coal Miner’s Daughter(1980) about Loretta Lynn, played by Sissy Spacek; Mike Leigh’s Topsy-Turvy (1999) about Gilbert and Sullivan, played respectively by Allan Corduner and Jim Broadbent.

220px-Walk_the_line_poster
Florence_Foster_Jenkins_(film)

In the 21st Century we have James Mangnold’s Walk the Line (2005) about the early life of Johnny Cash, played by Joaquin Phoenix, and June Carter, played by Reese Witherspoon; and Stephen Freares delightful Florence Foster Jenkins (2016) with Meryl Streep in the title role, as the woman labelled ‘the worst opera singer in the world’.

220px-FunnyGirlPoster
220px-1993GypsyFilmPoster
LifeWithJudyGarland

Films based on Broadway musicals include William Wyler’s Funny Girl (1968) with Barbara Streisand repeating her performance as Fanny Brice, catapulting Streisand to international stardom. There are also a number of ‘made for television’ films and mini-series, such as Gypsy (1993) based on the Broadway musical of the same name about Gypsy Rose Lee, with Bette Midler as Lee’s mother, Rose; and Life with Judy Garland: Me and my Shadows (2001) with Judy Davis giving a mesmerizing and award winning performance as Judy Garland. There are many others, but these are my personal favourites.

download-5
51v+wXMXQUL._SY445_
download-6
220px-Deepinmyheartposter

Deep in My Heart is the fourth in a series of ‘musical bio-pics’ that MGM made in the late 1940s and early 1950s. The others include – Till the Clouds Roll By (1946) about Jerome Kern, Words and Music (1948) about Richard Rodgers and Lorenz Hart, and Three Little Words (1950) about ‘Tin Pan Alley’ team Bert Kalmar and Harry Ruby. All these films are highly fictionalized, sanitized and sentimental, to the point of absurdity, treatments of the respective real artists lives. However, they all worth watching as these films contain spectacular musical numbers featuring the greatest MGM musical stars, including Judy Garland, Gene Kelly, Fred Astaire, Cyd Charisse, Lena Horne, Frank Sinatra and Mickey Rooney. As one critic in Variety wrote about Till the Clouds Roll By – ‘Why quibble about the story?’.

I love the works by Sigmund Romberg. Deep in My Heart may not be historical accurate, nor is it particularly dramatically interesting, but the songs and the musical sequences are thrilling. They don’t necessarily capture the magical potency they have in the theatre, but as a tribute to Romberg, which is what the film essentially is, they are truly excellent. Furthermore, they are performed by great musical artists, including Gene Kelly, Ann Miller, Ann Blyth, Jane Powell, Howard Keel – and more. There is a wonderful musical number, ‘I Love to go Swimmin’ with Wimmin’, with Gene Kelly and his brother Fred Kelly, the only time they appeared together on-screen.

jane-powell-deep-in-my-heart-1954-BPA8ER
images-4
images-7
images-2
fred-kelly-gene-kelly-deep-in-my-heart-1954-HXHJ7Y
images-3
images-6

The film ‘stars’, however, are Jose Ferrer as Sigmund Romberg and Merle Oberon as Dorothy Donnelly, who was Romberg’s friend and wrote the book and libretto for The Student Prince (1924), Romberg’s most successful musical/operetta. Jose Ferrer is a terrific actor who rose to fame with his Academy Award winning performance of Cyrano de Bergerac (1950). Merle Oberon is one of the screens great ‘professional beauties’, and is also an excellent actress. Whilst Jose Ferrer is a bit hammy and theatrical as Romberg, in the most delightful way, it is Merle Oberon who brings real gravitas, heart and soul to the film. Her final scene is extremely moving.

images-1
images-5
images

Deep in My Heart follows the rise of Sigmund Romberg as a young ‘Tin Pan Alley’ composer in New York who prefers the more classical repertoire from his homeland Vienna than the contemporary and popular ‘ragtime’. After meeting Sam Harris he succumbs to popular tastes and writes a string of ‘hits’ with the hope that he will eventually be able to do his own preferred work. This he finally achieves with the production of Maytime (1917) and Blossom Time (1921), quickly followed by his masterworks The Student Prince (1924), The Desert Song (1926) and The New Moon (1928). He then lapses into relative obscurity, no longer deemed ‘fashionable’, Finally, however, after the death of his dear friend Dorothy Donnelly, and with the encouragement of his wife, he does a special concert at Carnegie Hall that honours him, his music and his legacy.

blossom_time_cover
Maytime-Will-You-Remember
static.playbill
static.playbill-1

His legacy – yes! Romberg is perhaps still considered ‘unfashionable’, nonetheless, his work is still highly relevant. His highly romantic songs prefigure those one can find in the works of Andrew Lloyd Weber, as well as Claude-Michel Schonberg and Alain Boubil. These musical theatre artists, as well as Romberg fall into those works that bridge formal Viennese operetta and conventional jazz and pop orientated musical theatre. Romberg’s work is just as valid in musical theatre training as are the works of Gilbert and Sullivan – maybe even better – as they provide a ‘classical’ foundation for the singing voice that is perfect for modern musical theatre.

Desertsong
download-1
download-3
Poster - Desert Song, The (1929)_01

So why is Romberg not done? I know from bitter experience that in a number of cases in regard to training I had to insist that Romberg was included in respective exercises and showings. This was somewhat reluctantly agreed too, but with a shaking of heads and sense of patronizing and indulging the ‘old man’. However, in all cases, once one of Romberg’s songs was performed the magic happened. They have their own unique and dramatic potency that can enrapt an audience. Rather than simplistic, overt sentimentality they demand considerable depth and technical skill. This is best exemplified by ‘Deep in my heart, dear’ from The Student Prince, ‘The Desert Song’, ‘Romance’ and ‘The Sabre Song’ from The Desert Song, and ‘Softly, as a Morning Sunshine’ and ‘Lover, Come Back to Me’ from The New Moon.

1785fe118e0aacdc030679d40da77075--new-moon-vintage-paper‘Lover, Come Back to Me’ is quite rightly one of the most important and wonderful popular songs from the 20th Century, evident in the many past and modern artists who have recorded their own versions of this beautiful song. Furthermore, there are the thrilling energetic numbers, such as ‘The Drinking Song’ in The Student Prince, ‘The Riff Song’ and ‘The Military Marching Song’ in The Desert Song, and ‘Stouthearted Men’ in The New Moon. It is perhaps difficult for young people to appreciate that when ‘The Drinking Song’ was first performed in 1924 its enormous popularity was almost regarded as revolutionary in ‘Prohibition’ America. It is still a wonderful and powerful ‘show-stopper’.

This prejudice against Romberg, however, I fear will remain – until a visionary producer/director comes along and re-invents the work in the same way that Joseph Papp re-invented Gilbert and Sullivan’s The Pirates of Penzance in 1981, turning that show into a modern mega-hit. This could easily happen to The Desert Song, as it could with another similar work from the same period – Rudolf Friml’s The Vagabond King (1925). All of Romberg’s major musicals were turned into films. Whilst these films may endorse the ‘unfashionable’ opinion of Romberg, nonetheless, they are all we currently have as a record of these once extremely popular works – plus Stanley Donen’s Deep in My Heart. There are also, however, numerous recordings by past and modern singers, classical and popular, who at the very least are savvy and clever enough to appreciate the power and potency of the works of Sigmund Romberg.

3014148
friml-rudolf-the-vagabond-king-chant-piano-1926
download
220px-VagabondKing1930
download-4
download-2
220px-The_Desert_Song_FilmPoster
new-moon-a-1940-musical-film-starring-jeanette-macdonald-and-nelson-EC7WG0
MPW-48946
The-Desert-Song-1943-film-images-922e9c61-0efa-4e86-a11f-e9ccc0fdfb9
images-8

TONY KNIGHT

PLAY: The Teahouse of the August Moon

25 Wednesday Jan 2017

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in ACTING, ACTORS, AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, DRAMA, FILM, HISTORY, LITERATURE, MOVIES, PLAYS, THEATRE, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1950s, CINEMA, DRAMA, FILM, Hollywood, MOVIES, PLAYS, PUBLIC ART, THEATRE

imgres

THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON

Tonight I watched THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON, a 1956 American film comedy based on the play and book of the same name; all of which were very successful at the time. I have long been aware of this play and film, and its success and importance in American drama, but this was the first time that I had ever actually sat down and watched it through. It was also of great interest to me – being a Marlon Brando fan – to watch Brando’s attempt at a complete transformation.

6661827-m
images-2
images-4
images-3

THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON by John Patrick, based on the 1951 novel of the same name by Vern Sneider, opened on Broadway 15 October 1953. It was a great success, winning numerous awards, including the Tony and the New York Drama Critics for Best Play, as well as the Pulitzer Prize. David Wayne won the Tony Award for Best Actor for his performance as the Japanese interpreter, Sakini. The subsequent film in 1956 featured Marlon Brando as Sakini, with Glenn Ford as Captain Fisby, and Machiko Kyo as Lotus Blossom, a Geisha. Whilst Brand and Ford may be relatively well known, Machiko Kyo may not be – not until one is reminded that she is the female lead in Kurosawa’s RASHOMON (1950); this was to be her only non-Japanese film, and stands in contrast to most of her work.

images-7
imgres-1
imgres-2
imgres-3
images-13

Standing in contrast – this implies a challenge – a departure from what may have been a generally accepted public persona by a particular actor. The same is true for Marlon Brando. His Sakini must be one of Brando’s most light-hearted characters, and certainly his most successful comedy.

vlcsnap-2011-07-30-02h10m26s109
images-11
images-10
blogbrando-copy

It has been customary to lam-blast this play, as well as Brando’s performance for ‘yellow-washing’. In other words, a ‘white actor’ playing an Asian character. This is still very much an issue today, part of a general push internationally for more employment and equal opportunities for non-white performers. I do not wish to enflame this debate, but rather for this once highly regarded play, and film, to be re-assessed. Why? Because it is absolutely charming, funny, joyous and touching.

mv5bnmnhzwq3zgitotqxoc00otjkltljmjutmzy4zgu4ody4mtljxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymta2mdq4mg-_v1_sy240_cr00426240_al_
mv5bmdu4ywmxnjmtndvhys00mmuwlwfhyjytnwmxzwvhogjintjkxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymta2mdq4mg-_v1_
vlcsnap-2011-07-30-02h30m19s235

 

Yes – yes – it is full of stereotypes, funny-little-Asian folk v crass excitable American soldiers. Yes – it is very much a product of its time – post WW2 American drama. I have written before about this period, which also saw the beginning of the Cold War, McCarthyism, HUAC, and the publication of the Kinsey Report, the first in-depth study of the sexual activities of the contemporary American male and female. As previously mentioned, in a great deal of American drama in this period, there is considerable focus on the uncovering of a secret; that something rotten lies buried within that dramatically will eventually be exposed. The same is true for THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON. There is a secret – which is the actual construction of the TEAHOUSE, which is not why Captain Fisby was sent to the village of Tobiki in Okinawa – he was sent to create a schoolhouse and advance ideas of American democracy.

3

There is a delightful satiric edge to how both the American and Japanese characters react and relate, to each other as well as the different cultures and ideas of respectability and images-14honour. It’s all very light-hearted, whimsical and fun. For example, at the beginning of the film, Colonel Wainwright Purdy III (yep – that’s his name) is worried about the morals of the men n his charge. Purdy is played by Paul Ford who played the character on Broadway. Purdy has seen Officers dancing with enlisted men! He instructs his Sergeant (played by Harry Morgan) to send out a memo – ‘No officer can dance with his privates!’. Well – it made me giggle.

I don’t wish to spoil the enjoyment that still can be had from this massive hit play and film from the 1950s. It certainly can be accused, and has been, of racial stereotyping, and a whole lot of other seemingly modern-day offensive matter. However, moving through this may I offer a couple of things in its defense.

For the play and the film to be so successful there must be something more than just the whimsy associated with a light-hearted cultural clash – and there is. The story verges on tragic-comedy at the end when Fisby’s Teahouse is exposed and he is ordered to leave. The final scene between he and Lotus Blossom, with Sakini as translator, in the ruins of the recently destroyed Teahouse, is extremely moving; and beautifully played by Brando, Ford, and especially Machiko Kyo. It is about the complexity of saying goodbye to someone and somewhere you deeply love, about acceptance in regard to things that drive people apart, the importance of memory of ‘time past’, and that one is ordinary and to be happy with that.

images-12
AA426177 cucina 420 319 300 4961 3764 RGB
AA426177 cucina 420 319 300 4961 3764 RGB
mv5bnzrhyzrmotetmmq4os00yzg3lwfiy2qtzdhmmdu2yjg2ywq2xkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymta2mdq4mg-_v1_sy240_cr00426240_al_

It is not a-typical at all in context with a lot of other drama of the time; the heroics are not of earth-shaking importance, there is no grand-standing declaration of independence, ethics, morals, and human rights – it is all quite ordinary, realistic, simplistic, and tragic in its predictability – but then – magic happens.

In the true nature of classical comedy, with a wonderful deus ex machine, there is a happy ending. To be honest – despite enjoying this climatic moment in the film I think this may work better in the theatre. After being completely destroyed the Teahouse is once again fully restored due to its full beauty through the ingenuity and craftiness of Sakini and the village folk of Tobiki.

To watch this ‘live’ in a theatre would be so uplifting and exciting as well as – well – magical – joyous theatre magic!

As a side note – if any Head of a Theatre Design Department should read this – try setting this play and its design challenge to a young design student. The Teahouse is created and it must be stunning and beautiful; it then must be destroyed; and then – in a matter of a minute, for the climax of the play, it must be magically rebuilt and restored to its full beauty.

As regard to Brando and his performance of Sakini, for which he worked diligently, and respectfully, fully committing his talent and skill, I enjoyed his transformation – or attempt at a transformation.

images-5
images-6

Brando had already established himself as the leading actor of his time with A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE (1951) and ON THE WATERFRONT (1954). THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON comes after DESIREE (1954) in which Brando plays Napoleon Bonaparte, and sits between GUYS AND DOLLS (1955) and SAYONARA (1957) in a kind of unique arc that involves romance, comedy and interest in Japanese culture, as well as his obvious artistic drive to transform and challenge himself with different dramatic styles and characters.

Despite modern sensibilities, there is an artistry with the actor at work, just as much as there is with Olivier’s Othello, or John Hurt’s Elephant Man, or Yul Brynner’s King of Siam. I don’t wish to offend anyone, but to censor and suppress a talented actor’s desire to transform into a character with a different racial background may be nowadays ‘politically correct’, nonetheless, it is still artistic censorship, and subsequently needs to be at least questioned.

FreeSpeechRadio
2-17-ever-been
images-38
images-39
images-37
images-36
20130223-205419-1
SenateHearings01
images-40
images-44
'It makes no difference what I say. You've already decided I'm guilty.' 'Gasp! The witch can read minds!'
‘It makes no difference what I say. You’ve already decided I’m guilty.’ ‘Gasp! The witch can read minds!’
imgres-6
images-41

You may be embarrassed and even offended by Brando’s performance – I was not; but rather fascinated (as always) with what he was going to do – how he was going to do it – and appreciating the artistic challenge. Not for all tastes, but hardly worth the outright condemnation that his performance as well as this play has earned. Whether or not this is cringe material or not, it is still worth watching – not necessarily because the transformation is successful or not but because of the attempt, the challenge for the actor, and the degree of difficulty.

But – have a look yourself – and you be the judge. I enjoyed it – immensely; and can easily see why this play and film were such big hits in the 1950s – and could be again! Why? Because it offers hope – hope for a better future, and joy in being human.

AA426177 cucina 420 319 300 4961 3764 RGB
AA426177 cucina 420 319 300 4961 3764 RGB
220px-teahouse_movieposter

I would so love to see this play in the theatre. I very much doubt, however, that I will. The size of the cast and the cost of the design alone would be enormous. Maybe in the US perhaps, where revivals of popular old classics such as HARVEY, PICNIC, and ARSENIC AND OLD LACE have been met with great critical acclaim and popular success. This is not the case here in Australia – a different aesthetic in which ‘de-constructivist’ theatre from the 1990s still reigns supreme, and every story and set is generally about a victim caught in a waste land – not much joy I’m afraid. THE TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON, subsequently, would be something radically different. Yes – ‘old fashioned’, but not without artistic worth, merit and success – hope and joy, and genuine theatre magic.

 

FILM: In A Lonely Place (1950) – Nicholas Ray and the ‘Cinema of Confinement’.

21 Sunday Aug 2016

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in ACTING, ACTORS, AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, DIRECTORS, DRAMA, FILM, MOVIES, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Film Noir, Gloria Graham, Humphrey Bogart, Nicholas Ray

imgres-3
imgres-11
imgres

When Nicholas Ray’s In A Lonely Place (1950) was first released, despite some critical acclaim, it was not regarded as a commercial success. Subsequently, however, In A Lonely Place is now often to be seen in the various respective ‘Top 100 American Films’ lists in popular magazines, such as Time (2005), and from films critics, such as Roger Ebert (2009), and in the current American Film Institute‘s list of the  Top 100 American Films. Made as a piece of American film noir it is unlike any other, which is typical of the films of Nicholas Ray (1911-1971), whose films often defy categorisation; and for me is a master in the Cinema of Confinement.

images-1 copy
images-3
imgres-1
imgres-2
imgres-4
imgres-5
imgres-6
imgres-7
imgres-8
imgres-9
imgres-10
imgres-12

Based on Dorothy H. Hughes’ In A Lonely Place (1947), one of the most popular crime fiction novels of the late-1940s, the book and subsequent film are very much imagesproducts of its time, and complements my on-going research into American Drama 1945-1955 – ‘I Know A Dark Secluded Place’ (see previous posts). The story stands alongside other popular contemporary crime fiction by female writers, notably Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca (1938) and My Cousin Rachel (1951)), as well as Vesta  Caspary’s Laura (1943), which were also successfully adapted to film.

What they share in common is the critique of how suspicion can poison, images-32 copyinfect and destroy relationships and people. This matter of the negative power of suspicion became a major theme in popular crime fiction and film in post-WW2 America; the same period that saw the devastating effect of the anti-communist ‘witch-hunt’ trials led by Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House of Un-American Committee. If you were even suspected of being a Communist your whole life was placed under scrutiny, the suspicion surrounding and confining you, and at the same time isolating and ostracising you from society.

images-9
imgres copy 2
220px-Suspicion_film_poster
imgres copy
220px-Laura23234

In A Lonely Place joins a select group of films in which the main tool of destruction is the insidious emotion of suspicion. Alfred Hitchcock’s Rebecca (1940), Suspicion (1941), Shadow of a Doubt (1943) and The Wrong Man (1957), as well as Otto Preminger’s Laura (1044),  are all concerned with the dramatic tension and subsequent actions that occur when the object of suspicion is a loved one. Some, like Rebecca and Suspicion have a relatively happy ending; others, like Shadow of a Doubt and In A Lonely Place do not.

In A Lonely Place features terrific performances from its two ‘stars’, Humphrey Bogart (1899-57) and Gloria Graham (1923-81), but perhaps the main reason why the film enjoys its current elevated status is due to its director Nicholas Ray, one of the most innovative, inventive and influential of the American directors in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s.

Nicholas_Ray
images-3 copy 2
images-8 copy
images-9 copy

Virtually every director from the French ‘New Wave’ cinema in the 1960s, particularly Jean Luc-Godard (1930- ) and Francois Truffaut (1932-84), acknowledged the vital influence of Nicholas Ray on their own work. Godard placed Nicholas Ray’s Bigger Than Life (1955) in his Top Ten American Films, and went on to state  – “There was theatre  (Griffith), poetry  (Murnau), painting (Rosellini), dance (Eisenstein), music (Renoir). Henceforth there is cinema. And the cinema is Nicholas Ray.” The ‘cinema’ of Nicholas Ray, however, is relatively difficult to define as his films often defy categorization. It is quite a diverse canon of work, ranging from the film noir dramas of They Live By Night (1949), Knock on any Door (1949), which was the first film he did with Humphrey Bogart and Santana Productions, and In A Lonely Place (1950), to the Western with Johnny Guitar (1954), to the social realism of  Rebel Without a Cause (1955), his most famous film, and to the historical epics of King of Kings (1961) and 55 Days in Peking (1963). 

THEY LIVE BY NIGHT
REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE
KNOCK ON ANY DOOR
KING OF KINGS
55 DAYS IN PEKING
Johnny_guitar

In the imaginative worlds created by Nicholas Ray, nothing is what it should or appear to be. Johnny Guitar (1954) may fall into the Western film genre, but is and remains unlike any other Western ever made. Roger Ebert draws attention to In A Lonely Place having all the trappings of a classic film noir, including a murder, as well as flawed and fated characters, and yet for Ebert In A Lonely Place is actually a romance, a tragic love story that  “is really about the dark places in a man’s soul and a woman who thinks she can heal them”. His films invariably deal with an isolated individual who is falsely perceived as a kind of ‘enemy of the people’ within a confined community, whether they be a delinquent teenage, such as James Dean’s iconic performance in Rebel Without a Cause, or Jeffrey Hunter’s Jesus of Nazareth in King of Kings (1961). The ensuing drama involves this individual battle’s against conformity; and on psychological level –  a besieged mentality within a confined space. This is given epic proportions in 55 Days in Peking, whereas  In A Lonely Place lies within the social realism of film noir and tragic romance.

I’m not going to give the plot away – too much – but rather encourage you to go and watch it without knowing exactly what happens. Suffice to say, that Humphrey Bogart plays Dixon Steele, an old and sardonic Hollywood screenwriter, who is accused of murdering a young girl, Mildred Atkinson, wonderfully played by Martha Stewart (1922- ), whom he had met at a nightclub and assisted him in the reading of a screenplay. His alibi comes from his neighbour, Laurel Grey, played by Gloria Graham.  Is he guilty? It would seem he is not – but there is something wrong. Dixon Steele and Laurel Grey fall in love; but their genuine love for one another is not enough to avoid the tragic consequences of suspicion and paranoia.

Gloria Grahame and Humphrey Bogart in Nicholas Ray's IN A LONELY PLACE (1950). Courtesy Sony Pictures Repertory/Film Forum. Playing 7/17-7/23.
Gloria Grahame and Humphrey Bogart in Nicholas Ray’s IN A LONELY PLACE (1950). Courtesy Sony Pictures Repertory/Film Forum. Playing 7/17-7/23.
129734862
in-a-lonely-place-5
1227-gg LonelyPlace
in a lonely place madman
imgres copy
In-a-Lonely-Place

Bogart and Graham are simply marvellous, their performances in this film rightly ranked amongst their finest. So too is the supporting cast, whose scenes with Bogart and/or Graham, sometimes very short, are amongst the highlights of the film. One memorable scene has Bogart as Dixon Steele passionately relating his version of how Mildred Atkinson was murdered to his newly married detective friend and his young wife, also excellently played by Frank Lovejoy and (Miss) Jeff Donnell. It is a truly creepy scene, enhanced, as Roger Ebert points out, by the way the scene is shot by master D.O.P., Burnett Guffey, with the light catching the pupils in Humphrey Bogart’s impassioned eyes.

images-3 copy
images-26 copy
images-23 copy
images-25 copy
220px-In_a_Lonely_Place_-_trailer_-_07

Gloria Graham, whom Roger Ebert calls a ‘legend’, became involved in the film due to her then husband, Nicholas Ray. Unfortunately it was during the shooting of this film that Graham and Ray split up. Although the numerous behind the scenes photos suggest a happy set, nonetheless, there was also considerable tension. Gloria Graham was forced to sign a guarantee that she would obey Nicholas Ray in all matters in regard to the film with no argument or resistance. Despite the personal cost it took to make the film, nonetheless, there is no obvious sign of the backstage turmoil in the final print – a credit to all involved. What is obvious, however, are the changes that Ray made to the original story, including the ending.

images-12 copy
images-29
27703_300dpi

[If you don’t want to know the ending of the film then jump the following paragraph and read it later after you have watched the film].

The screenplay adaption was written by Edmund H. North and Andrew Solt. It was, however, significantly altered by Nicholas Ray, with Humphrey Bogart’s approval, as the film was being made. In regard to the ending, as Nicholas Ray later commented, he did not like the way the original story climaxed and resolved – with another murder. He found it images-13 copytoo convenient and argued that the end of a relationship, the end of this relationship between Dixon Steele and Laurel Grey, did not have to end violently. In order to get what he wanted, Ray ordered everyone off the set except for Bogart and Graham, and proceeded to improvise with the actors to create the end scenes that became part of the final print of the film. It is an extraordinary and brave ending, more emotionally raw and brutal than leaping to the convention of film noir with another death. The characters part, with Bogart’s Dixon Steele leaving the past sanctuary of the apartment complex to face an unknown and uncertain future. This is just one example of the innovative and determination of Nicholas Ray’s unique vision, artistry and skill.

Nicholas Ray’s film all deal with a sense of confinement. As previously mentioned, this is apparent to the extreme by the besieged ‘westerners’ in 55 Days in Peking, but it is also observable in the relative domestic settings of Rebel Without a Cause and In a Lonely Place. It is how Ray chooses to shoot a particular scene; either the shot is very tight with the respective actors taking up the bulk of the screen, as if the screen itself is too small for them, or the actors are enclosed within a particular environment, such as the police station and the apartment complex and apartments in In a Lonely Place. 

humphrey_bogart2
images-16 copy
images-18 copy
imgres-3 copy
underb lonely
images-6
images-5
images-4
images-4
images-30
images
in-a-lonely-place-009-1000018404

Even in scenes set in the open air there is a sense of confinement, such as the pivotal scene on the beach at night that precipitates the wild car ride with Gloria Graham and an enraged and mad Humphrey Bogart at the wheel. On the beach the actors are confined in a small dimly lit space; there is no sense of expansion, but rather the opposite. This is further enhanced at how low Ray has the actors physically placed for most of the scene, as if the night environment is forcing them to lie low. Characters either yield to the conformity of the confined space or contend against it; in either case the confinement enhances as well as justifies the actions of the respective main characters.

images-35
images-2
In-a-Lonely-Place

The physical sense of confinement is matched by an equally psychological one, and In A Lonely Place given a stylistic twist that catches one unaware. For example, in the early scene between Dixon Steele (Bogart) and Mildred Atkinson (Stewart) at Steele’s apartment, the gushing enthusiasm of Mildred is also a little oppressive, enough for Steele to leave the living room, escaping to the relative privacy of his bedroom. What makes this unique is that Nicholas Ray has Martha Stewart’s Mildred directly address the camera.

images-9
lonely_place_03
imgres

This is initially a little disconcerting; as if we the viewer are Humphrey Bogart’s character. It is not so much the matter of the actual content of Mildred’s speech that is unsettling, but rather her ghoulish enthusiasm, driven by ambition and the desire to impress, which comes across also as form of madness.

Breaking the supposed imagined ‘4th Wall’ and directly addressing the camera/viewer is just one unconventional stylistic variation that Ray uses in telling this particular story. He briefly repeats this dramatic device later in the film when he has Gloria Graham’s Laurel Grey also look directly at the camera, concerned that Bogart’s Dixon Steele is actually a violent and brutal murderer from whom she must get away. This direct gaze is deliberate; it not only makes the viewer complicit in the character’s subsequent actions but also draws attention to the artifice of movie making. These are deliberate self-conscious creative choices in delivering the story of the film, a film that is set inside the confines of the ‘dream world’ of Hollywood.

The language of In a Lonely Place on the surface is atypical of American film noir. It is brash, full of double entredes, and loaded with numerous ‘wise-d5bb4f8d3a7bfc6dd40d6dd48652bc9ccracks’. The ‘wise-crack’ is the special domain of American humour, designed to puncture holes in the veneer of smug complacency and pretension of social respectability. The lines and the language are witty and smart, but also cynical and sardonic , revealing the hidden bitterness, anger and resentment, as well as stupidity and vanity in this dark world. Bogart and Graham are masters at delivering such lines, seemingly done effortlessly off-the-cuff, yet still a part of a combative form of dialogue, or love making.

There are so many great one-liners, too many to quote here. Go on-line and type ‘Movie Quotes In a Lonely Place’ and a plethora of lines from the film will pop up.

To give just a few that are wickedly funny – at the start of the film, when asked to define images-1what an ‘epic’ film may be, Martha Stewart’s bubbly Mildred says, ‘Oh, you know – a picture that’s real long and has lots of things going on’. There are numerous sardonic wise-cracking lines about movie making and Hollywood, They are often very funny, with a touch of bitter satire, and deadly.  Bogart’s Dixon Steele has the best lines; after all he is who is a seasoned Hollywood screenplay writer.

In one scene Bogart’s Steele turns on a merry younger producer celebrating his film’s successfully screening in Mexico, bluntly accusingIn-a-Lonely-Place-1950-00-05-02 him of being a ‘fake and a failure’ and a ‘thief’; the consequence being a brief physical skirmish with the young producer being thrown out of the club. The self-conscious referencing to movie-making is relatively constant, sometimes deliberately under-cutting more serious moments; such as after Dixon has alarmed his dinner hosts in lonelypresenting his version of Mildred’s murder, defending his position and description as ‘after all, I am a screenwriter’, and then making his exit with, ‘And having confused you, I must go’. Another somewhat rueful reflective line is one Dixon randomly throws at bemused waiter, ‘There’s no sacrifice too great for a chance at mortality’; to which the waiter rolls his eyes.

images-7Subsequently, In a Lonely Place joins other films from this period that are 220px-AllAboutEvealso critiques of Hollywood, namely Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950) and Joseph L. Mankiewicz’s All About Eve (1950). The numerous self-conscious wise-cracks about movie-making, and in particular the problems of being a writer in this world, draws attention to the artifice of presentation. What we see and hear is not necessarily the truth – ‘all that glistens is not gold’; although in this particular world the opposite also holds – ‘all that is suspicious is not deadly’ – and yet, this is a deadly world, quite sterile in many ways, and full of ghosts from the past.

There are so many quips and wisecracks, particularly about movie-making, that is seems that language to is feeling a sense of confinement in this ‘dream factory’. This is encapsulated in the chilling line that references the title of the film, said by Bogart’s Dixon Steele as he dramatically imaginatively recreates Mildred’s murder by strangulation, ‘You get to a lonely place in the road, and then you squeeze….’.

images-11
lc_in_a_lonely_place
images-5
imgres-1

The dramatic nature of Dixon’s means of expression is later discussed by his old friend and dinner host, Detective Sergeant Brub Nicolai (Frank Lovejoy) and his new young wife, Sylvia Nicolai (Jeff Donnell). Yes – Jeff Donnell is the name of the young actress – Google it; too much for this already overlong article. This scene, which gets quite heated at times, is beautifully played by Lovejoy and Donnell as a newly-wed young couple having a dispute. Lovejoy’s Nicolai gets particularly defensive and assertive in attempting to silencing his wife’s considered opinion, shouting that they always quarrel when she brings forward an interpretation based on the knowledge she relatively recently acquired through a university degree in psychology. It is a great scene, and this moment just one of its many wonderful little details. Suddenly, in a nut-shell, the whole battle that some advocates of psychology and psychological analysis experienced, in getting such methods accepted as viable common practice, is thrown under a harsh light; 1950s pig-headed, stubborn, arrogant, vain and fearful conservative masculine hostility to this relatively new ways of thinking.

The idealised post-WW2 American Male was under threat in 1950 America. Many of these men had done active military service and fought in WW2; and subsequently carried those immovable scars, ghosts and demons left by the brutal experience that conflict. They were 220px-Marlon_Brando_1948not Captain America; they were damaged goods, exemplified by Stanley Kowalski (Marlon Brando) in Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar Named Desire (1947). Whilst not a justification for Stanley’s rape and destruction of Blanche, nonetheless, if one sees Stanley, along with his ‘mates’ Steve and Mitch, as relatively newly returned ex-US Army WW2 survivors it partly explains the animalistic nature of the masculine violence, drinking, and camaraderie displayed by the men in this play. What is notable here, as exemplified by Brando in Streetcar, as well as Bogart in In A Lonely Place, and characters in other contemporary dramatic works, such as William Inge’s Come Back, Little Sheba (1950), Picnic (1953), and Bus Stop (1955), and Richard Anderson’s Tea and Symphony (1953) and Michael V. camaraderie A Hatful of Rain (1955), two of the most controversial American dramatic works of the period, is the re-defining of the American male.

This was somewhat complemented by the influence of modern psychology evident in the original crime fiction novels by female writers such as Dorothy H. Hughes and Daphne du Maurier. Ironically, whilst the films are made via a ‘male gaze’ the ‘female gaze’, the interpretation of character, remains relatively intact. However, perhaps the biggest influence on this redefining the American male was the publication of The Kinsey Reports (1948 / 1953). 

url
imgres

This was the first in-depth study of contemporary American adult sexual behaviour. The first volume, Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male (1948) caused a shock, an influential imgres-1shakedown exposing certain imgres-2relatively controversial sexual habits of the American Male, notably although not extensively, homosexuality. That the respective data and its accompanying psychological analysis had been published in the first place and then publicly discussed was remarkable and marks a significant change in the US in regards to notions, perceptions, and understanding of adult sexuality. The second volume, Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female (1953) was equally revealing, shocking many members and levels of society. Nonetheless, whether or not one agreed or disagreed with Dr Kinsey and his team’s findings and conclusion, the door had been opened and a fresh approach to understanding human publicly through psychoanalysis had definitely begun.

This shift is evident in the drama of the period. Not just the issue of secrets and lies, and the opportunistic witch-hunt destruction of others through suspicion, moral indignation, lies, misrepresentation, gossip and publicly, but  also in the manipulation of truth, bias, and gross injustice – all of which find the form and measure in contemporary American 1941freedomsdrama.  In the late 1940s and early 1950s, the idealism exemplified by President Roosevelt’s ‘Four Freedoms’ had begun to turn sour, partly because it was seen as unachievable due to a number of socio-political factors, including the now perceived taint of Communism. The world had changed; the energetic inspirational, aspiration optimism of the dramatic works of the 1930s and WW2 years, exemplified by the films of Frank Capra , Preston Sturges and Busby Berkley, and the plays by Kaufman and Hart, and the theatre of Mae West, Fanny Brice, and Florenz Ziegfeld, had gone. In its place came stories in which the subject matter and cathartic release was more associated with guilt, regret, anger and resentment; exemplified by the plays of Arthur Miller and Tennessee Williams, as well as in the films by Nicholas Ray such as In A Lonely Place.

Whilst suspicion plays a major role in the dramatic sense of confinement there is also the problem of being caught by a past life. Invariably something from the past is going to suddenly resurface and destroy current life. Every character in the film reacts to the present drama due to something in the past, which generally is alluded to but not seen. This is most apparent in Bogart’s Dixon Steele and Graham’s Laurel Grey, but it is also the case for the numerous cameo appearances that add vibrancy to the film, and in a couple of cases are pivotal to the unfolding drama.

images-3
Hadda_Brooks_singer

This is best exemplified by the absolutely delicious and hilarious performances of Ruth Warren as Effie the Cleaning Lady, and Ruth Gillette as Martha the Masseur.

images-7 copy
inalonelyplacebdcap5_original
images-30 copy

As their respective scenes unfold their current actions and attitudes are dominated by their past knowledge and experience of Laurel Grey. We never really find out the breadth and depth of their knowledge, nothing specific is ever stated, only an allusion to Laurel’s past behaviour and actions. As well as shot in a very particular way, the lesbian overtones in the scene between Laurel and Martha the Masseur, however, are unmistakable.

images-6 copy
images-19 copy
images-21 copy
images-28 copy
images-29 copy
images-34 copy

One vitally important scene involves a young man terrifically played by Don Hamin. It comes directly after the wild car ride, when the car carrying Bogart’s Dixon Steele and Graham’s Laurel Grey collides with a car driven by Howard’s Junior. A distraught Junior confronts Dixon Steele, crying out how much he has just spent on his car. In the subsequent action, Dixon nearly murders Junior with a rock. He is stopped in the nick-of-time by Laurel. It is a great scene and all three actors are fantastic.

inalonelyplace-4
43515_transportation-humphrey-bogart-gloria-grahame-in-a-lonely-place_200s
images-1
images-33 copy
Don Hamin in In a Lonely Place (1950)

As with most American film noir there is a sensual sexuality, encapsulated by Gloria Graham’s sultry Laurel Grey. Yet even here, Nicholas Ray makes subtle but important ows_13603449248919-1shifts in the conventional approach. There is a delicious playfulness in Graham’s Laurel; in one scene, after Graham’s Laurel has said she like his face, Bogart’s Dixon, leaning in for a kiss says, ‘You know, you’re out of your mind – how can anyone like a face like this…look at it’, Graham’s Laurel flattens him with, ‘I said I liked it – I didn’t say I want to kiss it’. In regard to becoming lover’s, however, Gloria Graham’s Laurel cuts through the meaningless chit-chat, sighing, ‘Isn’t there a simpler way?’ – very saucy and blunt; no surprise that a passionate kiss follows. Whilst their love is genuine there is also a flatness. This is best exemplified in a scene in the apartment’s kitchen between Bogart’s Dixon and Graham’s Laurel where they discuss their romance in terms of a Hollywood screenplay. The way Nicholas Ray has them placed on opposite sides of the kitchen, with Graham seated and Bogart standing, and the dry cynical analysis of their ‘romance’ is unsettling. This ‘romance’ is doomed.

images copy 2
tumblr_o6nx8dejPN1qd3lbbo1_500

The most often quoted line is Dixon’s reflection of lost love – ”I was born when she kissed me. I died when she left me. I lived a few weeks while she loved me’. Laurel echoes the line in the final moments of the film, as Dixon leaves the apartment complex, tearfully reflecting and lamenting, ‘I lived a few weeks while you loved me. Goodbye, Dix’. This line, and its romantic sentiment, is one of the few that is not squashed by cynicism but rather is the reflection of the deep sorrow and tragic vulnerability that lies at the heart of In a Lonely Place.

images-1
images-10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TONY’S MOVIES: HELL IN THE PACIFIC (1968)

20 Saturday Feb 2016

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in ACTING, AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, ART, FILM, HISTORY, MOVIES, PEOPLE, TONY'S TOURS - Travel Journal, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1968, Hell in the Pacific, John Boorman, Lee Marvin, Toshiro Mifune

John Boorman’s Hell in the Pacific is a curious WW2 film involving just two actors, Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune, playing respectively marooned soldiers on a deserted island in the Pacific. It is an extremely intense film, heightened by the language barrier that naturally exists between the two characters. Initially antagonistic towards one another the two characters find common ground in their mutual battle for survival. The rather abrupt ending is a bit disconcerting but it does leave one contemplating how it could end other than tragically. It is war that drove these two characters apart, it is the struggle for life that brings them together, and it is the return of war that finally destroys them.

John Boorman made this film in 1968, following his previous film with Lee Marvin, the excellent crime drama, Point Blank (1967), and four years before his masterwork Deliverance (1972). The film was shot in Rock Islands near Paulu, in the Philippine Sea. Unfortunately, the film did not do well at the box-office, but it is a film that I would recommend one to see. I like John Boorman’s films – they are not always absolutely perfect but they are always imaginative, intense and provocative, and invariably involve characters out of their so-called ‘comfort-zones’, in hostile worlds in which the battle for survival is paramount – such is the case with Hell in the Pacific. Furthermore, Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune are absolutely terrific.

Toshiro Mifune is one of my favourite actors of the twentieth century cinema. He did not make many ‘Western’ films, but as has been acknowledged Hell in the Pacific perhaps comes the closest in capturing Toshiro Mifune’s extraordinary screen presence, power and charisma that is so easily seen in the many masterpieces he did in Japan, especially with Akiro Kurosawa. I also recently watched Kurosawa’s film Scandal (1950), which stars Toshiro Mifune – and it is fantastic! I may be sounding like a obsessive fan but that old cliche that ‘he could make reading a telephone book interesting’ is one that I would certainly give to Toshiro Mifune.

 

 

AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950s: I WANT TO LIVE (1958)

12 Monday Oct 2015

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, FILM, HISTORY, LITERATURE, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment


images-1220px-I_Want_to_Live!I WANT TO LIVE (1958): 
This ‘courtroom’ drama is based on the real-life involving convicted murderess, Barbara Graham. Produced by Walter Wanger, and directed by Robert Wise (yes – the same Robert wWise who directed The Sound of Music), with a screenplay by Nelson Gidding and Don Mankiewicz, based on newspaper articles by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Ed Montgomery, and letter Barbara Graham. Whilst it would seem that the real Barbara Graham was actually guilty, nonetheless, the version follows its sources (Montgomery and Graham) that mounts an argument for Graham’s innocence and presents aimgres-4s passionate, opportunistic and reckless but also the victim of brutish masculine images-2manipulation. The soundtrack, featuring a jazz music score by Johnny Mandel, as well as Gerry Mulligan and his band, is excellent and was very popular when the film was released. It set a new standard and set exerted a considerable influence in regard to the use of jazz music in film.
imagesIt is, however, the final scenes that perhaps the real purpose behind the film becomes clear, and as is suggested in the title, is a highly emotional and taunt critique of the torturous path to the gas chamber, the death penalty for murder in this film. It is also highly crtical of the press and the perverse public fascination with the press. It uses the device of news reports via the newspaper as well as television, which was a relatively new means of mass communication at the time. The final scenes are truly harrowing, particularly because of the performance by Susan Hayward.

Susan imgres-1Hayward won an Best Actress Academy Award for performance, and she is absolutely terrific. It is bold, at times audacious performanceimages-4, in the classic American film noir realistic style. She follows the tragic path with great emotional attack. Despite the melodramatic nature of the narrative, nonetheless, Susan Hayward doesn’t sentimentalize the character but portrays her with a considerable range. likable and dislikable, selfish, foolish, and vulnerable; as mentioned the final scenes are truly extraordinary. You keep hoping for the best, you are led down that path for a number of times, it is torturous.

Highly recommended.

AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950s: COURTROOM DRAMA

10 Saturday Oct 2015

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, FILM, HISTORY, LITERATURE, THEATRE, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Recently I have become rather obsessed with ‘courtroom drama’. This was partly due to the paper I presented on American drama 1949-1954 early this year at the Musical Theatre Educators Alliance (MTEA) international conference at the Western Australian Academy of Performing Arts (WAAPA), in Perth, WA. This p220px-Gentlemen_Prefer_Blondes_(1953)_film_postereriod 220px-Movie_poster_for_-Witness_for_the_Prosecution-produced some of the greatest masterworks of American drama in theatre, film, radio and musical theatre, including Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. What soon became apparent was the number of courtroom dramas were produced in this period, which again includes The Crucible and also works from other domains, as diverse as the film Witness for the Prosecution and the musical Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Subsequently, I have started to look at the wide range of ‘courtroom drama’, with the only prerequisite that there was at least one scene, or act, set in a courtroom.

‘Courtroom drama’ is actually one of the oldest forms of drama, and has existed in numerous cultures and civilizations. One can argue that Aristophanes’ The Frogs is a type of classical Greek comedy ‘courtroom drama’. Shakespeare and other Elizabethan-Jacobean playwrights were strongly influenced by contemporary legal practices and affairs, partly because of the tradition of oratory and rhetoric but also because their audiences was made up by a considerable number of lawyers and law clerks, as well as courtiers, to whom the art of persuasion was part of everyday life. Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, The Winter’s Tale and Henry VIII are plays that contain pivotal courtroom scenes of a ‘life or death’ nature. In the modern world there have been films such as The Accused, A Few Good Men and In the Name of the Father, as well as popular television shows such as Law and Order.

There are many reasons why mankind has been fascinated with ‘courtroom drama’ – truth, justice, freedom of speech, crime, corruption, murder, greed, politics, romance, satire, and sex – the list goes on; in fact, courtroom drama has the lot. The American courtroom dramas of the 1950s were primarily reactions to McCarthyism and the anti-Communist investigations by the House of Un-American Committee.  One reason may have to do with the various actors who have excelled in playing roles in courtroom dramas, as either lawyers, judges, members of a jury, plaintiffs and defendants – such as Spencer Tracey, Henry Fonda and Charles Laughton. One film I recently watched was Judgement at Nuremberg, which contains two extraordinary performances by Judy Garland and Montgomery Cliff – raw emotion – harrowing – brilliant and unforgettable. Another reason may be because of the 220px-Fury_posternumber of master directors and writers who have produced courtroom dramas, including Fritz Lang, Stanley Kramer, Sidney Lumet and Alfred Hitchcock. Within the genre Hitchcock in his famous interviews with Truffaut makes the distinction between ‘who-done-its’ and other more complex drama; complex because of the characters and the specific situation, which doesn’t make the outcome so back and white. The Crucible is an example of a greater complexity – John Proctor is found guilty, and truth and justice is tarnished and the guilty go relatively unpunished. Whilst Hitchcock preferred those stories that involved complexity, I am not going to make such a preference; nor am always I going to fully explore the reasons why courtroom drama has occupied such a continuos position in world drama.  I simply wish to present the extraordinary range and diversity of courtroom drama with the hope that it may trigger a desire to watch a particular film, and/or read a particular play. I have already posted on my Facebook page a number of short critiques of the courtroom dramas I have already watched, including Judgement at Nuremberg, Love Among the Ruins, Inherit the Wind, The Paradine Case, The Letter and Witness for the Prosecution. Whilst all of the films I have watched so far h220px-170592-Judgment-at-Nuremberg-Posters220px-Madwoman_of_Chaillot_ave been terrific, or in a couple of cases – less than terrific – if there was one that has stood out for me as being unique and quite unconventional, not at all what I was expecting, it would be Bryan Forbes’ version of Jean Giraudoux’s The Madwoman of Chaillot with Katherine Hepburn heading a truly wonderful company of actors. OK – it is not a goof ‘film’; however, what it is about and the ending is particularly complex and unsettling.

On the urging of friends and family that what I am posting should really be on my WordPress blog site I will from henceforth endeavour to post my up-dates in regard to the courtroom dramas I have watched on this site – beginning with tonight’s courtroom drama – THE CAINE MUTINY (1954).

imgres

THE CAINE MUTINY is a 1954 film, based on Herman Wouk’s 1951 Pulitzer Prize Cainemutinybookwinning novel. The film was produced by Stanley Kramer and directed by Edward Dymtryk, with Humphrey Bogart, Van Johnson, Fred MacMurray, Jose Ferrer, E. G. Marshall, Lee Marvin and Robert Francis. The screenplay was by Stanley Roberts and Michael Blankfort, cinematography by Franz Planer, music by Max Steiner, and ‘Gowns’ by Jean Louis – yes ‘Gowns’, which I think is primarily a credit for the dresses the female characters wear in the film.

220px-CaineMutinyCourtMartialThere a number of interesting things about this film. The film took quite a long to time to get up, mainly due to the perceived need for the US Navy’s approval and involvement. Virtually at the same time that the film went into production in late 1953, Herman Wouk adapted his novel as a play, The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial, which was eventually successfully produced on Broadway in January 1954, directed by Charles Laughton, with Henry Fonda in the cast – both actors, as previously mentioned, very familiar with courtroom dramas. The film’s director, Edward Dymtryk was one of the ‘Hollywood Ten’, who refused to speak to the HUAC and was jailed with the others – until he changed his mind and did inform on some of his colleagues. The Caine Mutiny was his first film after his release from prison, and his most successful. The film is very different from the book and stage-play, although the court-martial is the major part of all three. The book’s main character is Ensign Keithimages-7 and there is a lot more in the book about Keith’s life. In the film Ensign Keith is played by the very handsome Robert Francis, who only made four films, The Caine Mutiny being his last before he was tragically killed in an plane accident in 1955 – he was only 25. Perhaps the most wonderful thing about the film, however, is the performance of Humphrey Bogart as Captain Queeg. Bogart is truly fantastic in this film, playing this complex character who may or may not be mentally ill. There is, however, in the court-martial,images-1 no doubt about Queeg’s mental health, and Bogart is superb, playing with a pair of ball-bearings, which is a wonderful example of the use of a ‘psychological gesture’ (and props) to convey the inner workings of a character – essential viewing for any young actor. It is not surprising that Bogart was nominated for an Academy Award for this performance, losing out to Marlon Brando in On the Waterfront. 

There is one other small but interesting little fact about The Caine Mutiny that is worth re-telling. A young actor called Maurice Micklewhite was using the stage name of Michael Scott until one night when he was in a telephone booth in Leicester Square, London, he was told by his agent that he had to change it as that name was already being used by another actor. He looked around and noticed that The Caine Mutiny was playing at the Odeon Cinema – and that is how Michael Caine became Michael Caine – true story.

The Caine Mutiny is a very good courtroom drama. What is particularly interesting is its study of a man who was once a highly respected and admired captain who due to the toll of service during wartime is a shattered man. This is, however, not necessarily apparent or stated until the end of the film when Jose Ferrer as the defending lawyer of the so-called mutineers lets them have it at their victory celebration, particularly Fred MacMurray’s character; Fimages-3red MacMurray once again playing a rather feckless and ethically dubiousimages-4 character who covertly undermines and lies and is quite treacherous. This scene is one of the highlights of the film, particularly because of the acting. However, even though the film is rated very highly I can’t help feeling that the play is better. This is because it is focused directly on the court-martial whereas the film endeavours to be more faithful to the book in expanding the narrative. Edward Dymtryk was not happy with the final result; he wanted it to be much longer. Harry Cohn, Chief Executive of Columbia Pictures who distributed the film, wanted it to be under the two-hour limit that was the convention for American films at that time. Subsequently, there are aspects of the film that, to me, seem a little uneven, and more like padding; for example, Ensign Keith’s troubled personal life with mother and girl-friend is not that interesting despite good performances – and the glorious ‘gowns’ by Jean Louis.

Recommended.

AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950s: “I Know a Dark Secluded Place” – WHAT LIES UNDERNEATH? SECRETS AND SEX – The Pajama Game and American Drama 1949-1954 – The Age McCarthyism, HUAC and The Kinsey Report

31 Friday Jul 2015

Posted by APHK PHOTOGRAPHY in AMERICAN DRAMA IN THE 1950S, ART, FILM, HISTORY, LITERATURE, THEATRE, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

This is a extended version of a lecture I recently delivered at an international conference in Perth, Western Australia, for the Musical Theatre Educators Alliance. It was an absolutely terrific conference with many excellent teachers and speakers. What was one of the most exciting aspects of this conference, however, was the many students from WAPPA, VCA, Federal and others institutions. Their openness, courtesy, bravery, intelligence and imaginations were inspirational to be amongst – thank you.

***

215px-ThePajamaGame1954

‘I Know A Dark Secluded Place’ – WHAT LIES UNDERNEATH?

SECRETS & SEX – THE PAJAMA GAME & AMERICAN DRAMA 1949-1954

THE AGE OF McCARTHYISM, HUAC, and THE KINSEY REPORTS.

Introduction

The years 1949-1954 are truly extraordinary in regard to American drama. The range and diversity, depth and breadth, audacity, grace and sheer brilliance marks this brief period as one of the greatest periods of American drama in theatre and film. To begin with 1949, which saw the premiere of Rodgers’ and Hammerstein’s South Pacific, one of the most popular works of the American Musical Theatre. At the other end of this five-year period is The Pajama Game, which opened in May 1954. These two works are masterworks in themselves, exemplified by their continued popularity and constant revivals either professionally or in amateur and student productions. It is, however, difficult for young people with their eyes firmly fixated on the modern, contemporary and relevant, to fully appreciate how truly extraordinary these works were (and still are), and how they stand as representative of the times in which they were created.

My argument is one that could be labelled ‘old-fashioned’, or even ‘classicist’. Through a particular method of ‘Research and Analysis’, which I use in my private studies as well as teaching, I intend to focus on the American drama of this period, and particularly The Pajama Game,  in a way that will hopefully illuminate as well as enlighten its delicate almost subversive position. The first part of the lecture is devoted to the method  I use in regard to ‘Research and Analysis’, the second part provides a somewhat lengthy overview of American Drama 1949-1954, and finally, the third part focuses on The Pajama Game – in the Age of McCarthyism, HUAC and The Kinsey Report.

Part 1: Research and Analysis

To many students ‘Research and Analysis’ can bring forth a shudder with the thought of long hours in a library and/or on the internet, endeavouring to find something that may enthuse or excite them about some dusty old classic that they are being made to write about as part of their coursework. Yes – it’s true. It is something you need to do, and should want to do, but it does require commitment, dedication and concentration.

The purpose of ‘Research and Analysis’, however, is relatively simple. Following the teaching of Constantine Stanislavsky, it is necessary to help unlock the door of ones imagination and creativity, as well as reveal the core or spiritual essence of the play. Furthermore, through stimulating your creative imagination it gives you the possibility of genuinely contributing in-depth knowledge to the creative process, allowing your opinions to have some gravitas and weight and meaning rather than superficial knee-jerk emotional responses. It also has the potential to provide wonderful insights and creative choices in regard to characterisation and a great entry-point into an imaginative world that is not like one’s own present reality. The dragging down influence of ‘relevance’, making everything have a value of immediate worth, otherwise it is useless, is far to censorious to me, and demeans not only the originality of the work, but also the potential creativity of the student.

The notable and successful actors whom it has been my good fortune to know and/or train, and there have been many, including Ms Blanchett and Ms Kidman (amongst numerous others), all have this one thing in common – a passionate dedication to research and analysis. However, this process does require guidance and limitations. You can do too much. One golden rule is that any research needs to be of value and significance to the actual creative process, otherwise, interesting though something may be, it is actually of little consequence – don’t do unnecessary research.

My method in regard to doing ‘Research and Analysis’ is based on six simple questions that can be applied to any text. These five questions help to provide a structure to your research and analysis of any given text.

1. Who is the author(s)? – The Artistic Identity

2. Why did he, she, or they write this piece? – The Motivation

3. What were the times like?  – The historical context

4. What is the story? – The sequence of Events

5. What is the piece about? – Theme

6. Are there any modern or classical equivalents? – The Imaginative Web

This paper is primarily associated with the third question. Nonetheless, let me briefly state what each question is actually about.

1. Who is the author(s)? – this is associated with articulating the ‘Artistic Identity’ of a particular writer or writers. By ‘artistic identity’ this is beyond the dry facts of an individual’s life, which is generally easily available and accessible. To help clarify this and the term ‘Artistic Identity’ ask yourself – what do you mean when your say a work, or a person is ‘Shakespearean’? What do you mean when you say something is ‘Chekhovian’?, ‘Chaplinesque’?, ‘Capraesque’?,’Cartoonesque’?, ‘Disneyfied’?, or any other generalised term that signifies a type of artistic genre. These are supposedly descriptors of an ‘Artistic Identity’, but what is your actual definition and opinion?

One way of establishing an ‘artistic identity’ is to look closely at the three ‘T’s’ – What is this artists’ actual Talent, Technique and Temperament? What is their unique skill, vision, methods, obsessions and personality? Look at their body of work and give that pre-eminence over any biographical fact. As T.S. Eliot correctly observed in regard to Shakespeare, poetry and poets in general, it is a mistake to think that Shakespeare personally experienced everything that is within either his Sonnets and plays – he did not; what is far more important is the power of his imagination, and how he turned ‘shadows’ into ‘substance’, giving ‘airy nothings’ a ‘habitation and a home’.

2. Why did he, she, the piece? – this may have many answers of course, and could be related to the biographical facts, as well as to the authors’ Temperament. A playwright such as Berthold Brecht, or David Hare and Howard Brenton may have definite socio-political triggers that spured them to write. Oscar Wilde believed that no great art exists without being triggered by a sense of out-rage, and Harold Bloom’s controversial theory about ‘mis-prisonment’ and ‘the anxiety of influence’ being the actual trigger for creativity, are examples of possible answers to this question. There is also the very pragmatic answer, one that reflects Calvin Coolidge’s comment about ‘What is the chief business of the American people? Business’, i.e. Money. Playwrights, screen-writers, composers etc., need to eat and pay rent and bills, as much as anybody else – they need money. Shocking though this may sound, but even the mighty Shakespeare wrote to make money; that he was highly successful is evident from his rise from being a poor son of a Warwickshire glover to a relatively prosperous owner of land and property in London and Stratford-upon-Avon, primarily through his play-writing and membership of the Chamberlain-King’s Men from 1594-1612. As I have mentioned before, in regards to my own work, I do somewhat flippantly state ‘I don’t do “Art” – I do “Show-Biz”!’ The ‘Show’ may be the art, but the ‘Biz’ is the pragmatic self exerting itself – I need to make money in order to have a life, and in order to make ‘art’.

3. What were the times like – the historical context? – is the subject matter for the second part of this paper, so I wont spend too much on it now. Suffice to say that each work of art exists within a particular historical context, and, as I will later elaborate, may be extremely representative of its time. This does not negate a works universality or even contemporary relevance, on the contrary it can enhance it and give greater depth and meaning and complexity. It also allows for an exploration into the details of social manners of a particular time that can be used on-stage and in performance. Why don’t you explore these following matters and how they help to illuminate certain late nineteenth-century plays by Ibsen, Chekhov and/or Wilde – what is the importance of calling cards? When one went calling on another person, how long were you expected to stay? What did you wear? Gloves? Underwear? Men as well as women wore corsets – how did that change and influence body language and physical expression, such as crossing the legs? Go and find out.

4. What is the story? – this is the sequence of events. E.M. Forster makes this distinction between ‘story’ and ‘plot’. The ‘story’ is the sequence of events, the bare skeleton, whereas the ‘plot’ provides the psychological depth and detailed context of the ‘story’, such as motivation and the actual ‘given circumstances’ for each section, chapter, and/or scene.

How do we tell a story? Listen very carefully how you and others relate the story of a play or film or even a personal experience. Invariably, most of narrative description will be precise and economical in the use of words. Primarily the event or experience  will be related through the usage of verbs. Certain lines and statements may be remembered, but the story will mainly be told through physical actions.

As an exercise, as well as professional practice, I encourage you, when starting to prepare for a rehearsal period, write down the sequence of events. Do it in dot form – and see if you can write it all down in one page. Put in the ‘Given Circumstances’ and just what happens in the scene. Do not add motivations and justifications, but concentrate on the physical action. For example – Shakespeare’s Macbeth Act 1 Sc. 1 – Three witches meet on a heath in Scotland, and resolve to come together again when the battle is done and meet Macbeth – then and cast a spell.

5. What is the piece about? – This is perhaps the most important question to answer. Why? Because once answered and agreed upon by the creative ensemble it helps to provide a central focus and a means to ensure that everyone is contributing and belonging in the same imaginative world of the play. It is a pet-hate of mine to go and see a play or musical and not all the actors are in the same imaginative world, evident in their acting – some are in melodrama and others are in Chekhov (arguably sometimes the same thing – but that is another essay).

What I don’t want here is the story-line or plot of the piece. That is something different – also important – but different. What is required here is an opinion, preferably one that is simple and economical and can be articulated in one word, phrase or single sentence.This question demands you have an opinion, and one that is based on your research and analysis based on the previous questions as well as you close reading and familiarity with a chosen work; for example – Macbeth is about ‘Death and the Imagination’. You are searching for themes; and there may be more than one, which is OK. But no matter what – right or wrong I don’t care – Have an Opinion! –  and bring it to the rehearsal room floor to be tested and discussed.

Theatre is a collaborative art form. It demands a discourse amongst creative artists that sometimes can become rather heated due to the emotional passion that is also a particular requirement for this as for any art form.  Have an opinion but also  allow yourself to be changed by the in-depth research and opinions of others. Question everything, including yourself. Just remember that your opinion, as well as others, needs to be based on a solid foundation of in-depth research and close examination of a text. Contextual study and analysis is essential. Be an intelligent actor, think – don’t just feel.

6. Are there any modern or classical equivalents? – Did you know that one of the first exponents of a world-wide-web on interconnected things, objects, people, places, politics, art, ideas and themes, was the nineteenth-century novelist George Eliot? 800px-Middlemarch_1You can find it her 1871-72 novel Middlemarch (yes – for those who don’t know, George Eliot was actually a woman, and one of the greatest English novelists of the nineteenth-century). Once you have answered the previous question – What is the piece about? – and have established a central theme, or a identified a number of themes and key issues, then by exploring to see if there may be any modern or classical equivalents may open up a whole new vista of exciting new worlds and works that are interconnected with the chosen text. This can be incredible and extremely stimulating as well as enlightening.

From my teaching experience, once a theme is established young people have no difficulty is finding modern equivalents, and this is where they can teach the teacher. Where they invariably have trouble is knowing ‘classical’ equivalents. Let’s take a very classic example – ‘Star-crossed Lovers’ – one of the oldest themes and subject matter in the chronicles of human history. This theme interconnects with Romeo and Juliet, and subsequently West Side Story and from my experience young people will also connect this theme with the modern film Titanic (I’m cheekily adding the old Barbara Stanwyck film Titanic as it is just as pertinent even if it is more about an older couple). What they may not know are the classical equivalents, star-crossed lover’s, such Phaedra and Hippolytus, Medea and Jason, Tristan and Isolde, as well as Arthur, Guinevere and Lancelot – and Camelot. For The Pajama Game, let’s say that it is about ‘Secrets and Sex’ – something that will be further discussed and realized in the second part of this lecture.

imgresPoster - Romeo and Juliet (1936)_02rom-and-jul_ger_54_aRomeo-and-Juliet-6images-3object29West_Side_Story_posterimages-4Titanic_poster

 ***

Part 2: American Drama 1949-1954

The main focus of this section is to provide an overview of American drama 1949-54, and how it reflects certain issues involving secrets and sex, which is reflective of this period so influenced in the domestic world of the US by the anti-communist witch-hunts, as well as The Kinsey Reports, the first fully detailed research into the sexual behaviour of contemporary American men and women.

images-32The Post World War II years for the USA were extremely important in that they influenced national and international events and people in a way that is still very much with us today. War was good for the US economy, and under President Harry Truman, the continuation of a war economy was deemed ideal for the American people. If that meant an international war against those damn Russian and Chinese Commies to prevent a kind of domino effect of virulent Communism sweeping through the civilized democratic world – then so be it. If that also meant a war imgres-14on the domestic front against so-called American citizens, then so be it. This marks the beginning of what collectively has become known as The Cold War (1947-1991). As Gore Vidal noted, America under Truman decided to become the world’s ‘watch-dog’, the world’s ‘police force’. The first major international salvo was the Korean War (1950-53), meanwhile on the domestic front the US Government, under the guise of ‘national security’ declared war on its own people, or rather a certain section of people, notably from the world of academia, literature, and the performing, as well as government and business.

images-13With the advent of the Cold War, and the government declaring war on its own citizens, enter Senator Joseph McCarthy, closely followed by HUAC, imgres-16the House of Un-American Committee, and their passionate, some might even say insane and hysterical hunt for ‘Reds Under the Bed’, Commie spies and other nasty corrupters of the idealized (sanitized-white) American democratic way of life. They are responsible for many things, but most importantly for American drama they helped to create a culture of fear, an in particular a fear of the ‘other’, the outsider, and fear of one another.

It was a witch-hunt, a kind of perverse and perverted civil war that was anything but civil. Anyone who was who deemed non-conformist to the ‘American way of life’ as envisaged and idealised by arch conservatives exemplified by images-44Joseph McCarthy and his cronies, which included images-30Richard Nixon, and HUAC and its supporters, such as J. Edgar Hoover, Head of the FBI, were consider ‘outsiders’ and ‘aliens’, and subsequently could be considered as possibly being a ‘Commie spy’, and therefore needed to be rooted out and removed. Somewhat predictably the focus descended upon Jews, and outspoken academics and African-Americans, exemplified by the tragedy220px-Gentleman's_Agreement_(1947_movie_poster) of the Rosenbergs, as well as Arthur Miller, and images-5Paul Robeson, the great African-American singer-actor who first sang Jerome Kern’s ‘Old Man River’. One of the great American films that deals with anti-Semitism on the domestic from is Elia Kazan’s Academy Award winner for Best Film Gentlemen’s Agreement (1947). As will later be touched on, there is a certain amount of irony in regard to this and Elia Kazan’s involvement in the anti-Communist witch-hunt in the early 1950s.

hblock42

‘You read books, eh?’

20130223-205419-1

‘All we want is the truth as we see it’

images-41

‘It’s Okay – We’re Hunting Communists’

14eda8c3747534b133eef45c2cddcc46

“Say, What Ever Happened to ‘Freedom-From-Fear’?”

Mc Cartton 2

‘We Have Documentary Evidence That This Man is Planning a Trip to Moscow”

communist-propoganda1

‘Report to me on the traitors and queers in my administration and I may or may not tell the people’.

dfee0e3d70e0e3558a75aa29f2c2741d

“Stand Fast, Men…they’re armed with Marshmallows”

72ceab99f6ba0bafb326d036a531ff48

imgres-19

Deleted Photos / Faked Letter

'It makes no difference what I say. You've already decided I'm guilty.' 'Gasp! The witch can read minds!'

‘It makes no difference what I say. You’ve already decided I’m guilty.’ ‘Gasp! The witch can read minds!’

Actually, I’m not going to dwell too long on these separate and yet intertwined tentacles of evil (sorry – but they are both truly repugnant and should not be given too much air time). The various images I have provided speak enough for themselves. I wish to concentrate on their effect on American drama at this time. However, a quick sideline that I do wish to relate is the issue of Elia Kazan, that kind of encapsulates the complexity of this time and how works from this period should not be underestimated in regard to hidden depths and meanings.

elia-kazanElia Kazan – a genius – responsible for directing and shaping some of the most memorable works in American theatre and film in the twentieth-century. This includes – The Skin of Our Teeth (play), Death of a Salesman (play), A Streetcar Named Desire (play and film), Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (play), Sweet Bird of Youth (play), The Dark at the Top of the Stairs (play), Tea and Sympathy (play), Gentlemen’s Agreement (film), Pinky (film), Panic in the Streets (film), East of Eden (film) and On the Waterfront (film). He was also an informer. In front of HUAC Kazan informed against old colleagues and friends tumblr_inline_nc5sy2SU7Q1qe6nze(as did Jerome Robbins and Ginger Rogers), particularly his former Group Theatre colleague, the playwright Clifford Odets, effectively ending Odets’ career.imgres One of Odet’s final successes was performed in this 1949-54 period – The Country Girl (1950), which was subsequently turned into a highly successful film in 1954, starring Bing Crosby, William Holden, and Grace Kelly in an Academy Award winning performance for Best Actress. Kazan’s naming names complements the whole history of the group collectively known as ‘The Hollywood Ten’. The destruction of the careers and lives of these and other significant artists exemplifies the truly disgraceful betrayal of trust, friendship and loyalty that is also characterisitic of this period – You’ve Got To Be Carefully Taught.

images-40

It is difficult for me to be sympathetic, or even empathetic to such actions – even though these people may have thought they had reasons considering the horrors of the Gulags that Stalin was inflicting on his people and so-called Russian comrades at the same time. You are all probably too young to remember that when Kazan was honoured with a special Academy Award towards the end of his life, he was brought on stage, flanked deliberately with Martin Scorsese on one side and Robert De Niro on the other. To say that the reception from the Hollywood elite was anything but an unanimous standing ovation would be a fair description. Half rose and cheered and roared, whilst the other half sat ridged, not applauding but frowning and glowering at Kazan – no, for a large section of Hollywood, genius and important artist he may be, but he was not forgiven for what he had done to past friends and colleagues. It was a lesson – and a scary one.

Anyway – sorry about that – a bit of a digression. Nonetheless, the testing of loyalties and friendships is but one of the main features of American drama in this period often set against a world that is obsessed with with something secret, with something that is seen as a perverse and corrupting threat and li7316-1es hidden within a domestic setting. What is also very common is the amount of court-room drama. The voyeurism, or spying, associated with this type of drama is exemplified by Hitchcock’s Rear Window (1954). There are, however, other examples that are perhaps not as famous as Hitchcock’s masterpiece, but deserve to be reexamined for their dramatic strength and purposefulness. I will come back to this issue in regard to voyeurism and/or spying and The Pajama Game. However, first I want to give a quick overview of American drama from 1949-1954, primarily for the numerous excellent works to speak for themselves in regard to how truly extraordinary is this remarkable period.

Let’s begin with the American Musical Theatre.

images-80One of the all-time great American musicals is Rodgers’ and Hammerstein’s South Pacific, which opened on April 7 1949. Whilst Some Enchanted Evening may be the most popular song from South Pacific, and certainly deserves its place in ‘The Great American Songbook’, another song from this magical score, You’ve Got To Be Carefully Taught is perhaps more prophetic and apt for the years that were to follow 1949. This highly provocative and controversial song, one of the most (if not the most provocative and controversial songs that Rodgers and Hammerstein ever wrote, is a direct attack on the brain-washing culture of hate, bigotry and racism, so prevalent in the USA at this time, and perhaps remains so. It is a bitter, bitter song, full of anger, passion and disgust for the conventional norm; it is brilliant – and for the time extremely brave. Yes – Some Enchanted Evening, I’m Going to Wash That Man Right Out of My Hair, Bali Hai, There is Nothing Like a Dame, Younger Than Springtime and much more are sheer delights, but for me and for this lecture that involves WHAT LIES UNDERNEATH, You’ve Got to Be Carefully Taught is actually what South Pacific is all about; Rodgers and Hammerstein thought so too. If you are seeking a real acting challenge in regard to the performance of a song – have a go at this one. The sense of rage, suspicion and betrayal that lies in the belly of this song, is reflective of a general trend in American politics and social history and that understandably and brilliantly are mirrored in American drama of this period.

imgres-1

1949-54 is full of terrific works of the American Musical Theatre, some of which have subsequently become ‘classics’. Rodgers and Hammerstein followed South Pacific with The King and I (1951). There was also Kurt Weil’s and Maxwell Anderson’s Lost in the Stars (1949), Jule Styne, Leo Robin, Joseph Fields and Anita Loos‘ Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1949), Irving Berlin’s Call Me Madam (1950), Leonard Bernstein’s Peter Pan (1950) Frank Loesser, Abe Burrows and Jo Swerling’s Guys and Dolls (1950), Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Lowe’s Paint Your Wagon(1952), Harold Rome’s Wish You Were Here (1952) and Fanny (1954), gentlemenLeonard Bernstein, Betty Comden and Adolph Green’s Wonderful Town (1953), Borodin and Forest’s (et al) Kismet (1953), Jerome Moross and John Treville LaTouche’s The Golden Apple (1954), Truman Capote and Harold Arlen’s House of Flowers (1954) Sandy Wilson’s The Boyfriend (1954), Cole Porter’s Can-Can (1954), and Jerry Ross, Richard Adler, George Abbott  and Richard Bissell’s The Pajama Game (1954).

raw_file_url imgres-22imgres-25paintimages-69goldenapple_obchouse-of-flowers-broadway-movie-poster-1954-1020407584 imgres-38PeterPan-1950-ArthurKarloffcancanobc51sSkhkFcNLimgres-23

In regard to American plays it was also the time that saw the premieres of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman (1949), Sidney Kingley’s Detective Story (1949), William Inge’s Come Back Little Sheba (1950) and Picnic (1953), Carson McCullers’ The Member of the Wedding (1950), Clifford Odets’ The Country Girl (1950), Tennessee Williams’ The Rose Tattoo (1951) and Camino Royale (1953), John Van Druten’s Bell, Book and Candle (1950) and I Am a Camera (1951), Joseph Kramm’s The Shrike (1952), George Axelrod’s The Seven Year Itch (1952), Arthur Laurent’s The Time of the Cuckoo (1952), Frederick Knott’s Dial M for Murder (1953), Horton Foote’s A Trip to Bountiful (1953), Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953), John Patrick’s Teahouse of the August Moon (1953), Robert Anderson’s Tea and Sympathy (1953), Herman Wouk’s The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (1953), Agatha Christie’ Witness for the Prosecution (1954), Samuel N. Richard Nash’s The Rainmaker (1954), and Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men (1954), Maxwell Anderson’s The Bad Seed (1954), Joseph Hayes’ The Desperate Hours (1954).

Witness-for-the-Prosecution-Playbill-12-54The-Trip-To-Bountiful-11-53-1The-Time-of-the-Cuckoo-Playbill-11-52The-Shrike-Playbill-01-52The-Rose-Tattoo-Playbill-02-51The-Seven-Year-Itch-Playbill-05-54The-Rainmaker-Playbill-10-54The-Member-of-the-Wedding-Playbill-01-51The-Country-Girl-Playbill-11-50The-Bad-Seed-Playbill-12-54Picnic-Playbill-06-53images-39images-50images-86imgres-30images-1220px-CaineMutinyCourtMartial180px-Twelve_Angry_Men_Roundabout200px-DeathOfASalesmancrucible-1953-poster

In addition what are arguably the two greatest American plays of twentieth-century, Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman and The Crucible, as the above abbreviated list illuminates this was a very exciting time for plays as well as musicals. What is also very apparent, complementing the respective anti-Communist imgres-15investigations and trials across the country, is the amount of Courtroom Drama, which also includes The Crucible, as well as The Shrike, The Caine-Mutiny Court-Martial, Witness for the Prosecution and Twelve Angry Men – all terrific plays. This stands in marked contrast to today where Courtroom Drama is not a mainstay of contemporary drama. The courtroom dramas of the early 1950s also complement the major theme of secrets that characterises American drama of this period with the narrative being the revelation of that secret and the exposure of something corrupt and inherently evil hidden and underminingimages-24 a democratic society. images-36They are essentially morality plays, with good generally triumphing over evil, the major exceptions being The Crucible, which is tragedy on an epic scale, and the curious and rather unsettling The Shrike. A great many of these plays and musicals also complement another very common characteristic in American drama and literature, which is the central hero and/or heroine is a type of ‘underdog’ who contends against authourity, sometimes successfully, as in The Pajama Game, and sometimes not, as in The Crucible. 

images220px-AnatomyMurder2Why was Court-Room Drama so popular at this time? Considering the very public and highly controversial nature of the real-life anti-Communist trials that were going on you would think that the American public would have had a gut-fill of it all – but they didn’t. Moreover, Court-Room Drama was popular throughout the world, as exemplified by the international success of the film versions of The Caine-Mutiny Court-Martial, retitled The Caine Mutiny (1954) with Humphrey Bogart giving one of his best acting performances, Twelve Angry Men (1957) directed by Sidney Lu220px-Compulsion-Postermet with Henry F220px-Rashomon_poster_2onda, and Witness for the Prosecution (1957) with Tyrone Power, Marlene Dietrich, and brilliant performance by Charles Laughton, accompanied by his real-life wife Elsa Lancaster. To these can be added Akira Kurosowa’s extraordinary and influential Rashomon (1950), as well as Otto Preminger’s Anatomy of a Murder (1959) and Richard Fleischer’s Compulsion (1959). Court Room drama can be sensationally dramatic, and is important in regards to the psychological development of character with the gradual revealing of inner emotional depths.

Thinking of character, however, leads to the even greater illumination of the extraordinary range and diversity of male and females roles in American drama of this period. This also complements to a certain degree the high standard and quality of post-war American actors, many of whom by now had been trained by some of the early American interpreters of Constantine Stanislavsky’s acting techniques, including Lee Strasberg, Stella Adler, Uta Chekhov, as well as Michael Chekhov (originally from Stanislavsky’s Moscow Arts Theatre), and those who had been members of the influential The Group Theatre under Harold Clurman, and Orson’s Welles’ Mercury Theatre with John Houseman. Metamorphic transformations by actors playing characters with considerable psychological depth and also undergoing a demanding and dramatic journey of great challenges and change becomes the common element.

To further illustrate my point, however, let me draw your attention to some of the female characters from this time. The range, complexity and depth is wonderful, and to be blunt a blessed break from the incessant passive-aggressive victims that tend to dominate modern drama (also another essay re the modern female heroine). In the drama from the early 1950s we run the gamut, not as Dorothy Parker once wrote of Katherine Hepburn from A to B, but a whole spectrum of great female roles. This includes loyal wives, spinsters and old maids, innocent virgins and sex sirens, generally experiencing some form of sexual awakening, and a few witches, good and bad, as well. For example, John van Druten’s plays are not often performed anymore, which is a shame as they are truly delightful and have their own unique delicate charm. They include, I Remember Mama, (1944), which was Marlon Brando’s first Broadway show, Bell, Book and Candle (1950), which is a romantic comedy involving good witches, and I Am A Camera (1951).

iamcamera11

I Am A Camera is important for a number of reasons, not least being Van Druten’s last major work, but also being based on Christopher Isherwood’s ‘Berlin Stories’ it is the first successful dramatic appearance of Sally Bowles. This delightful, enigmatic, vital character, was originally played by Julie Harris, one of the truly great American actresses of the mid-late-twentieth century. Audiences are perhaps more familiar with the musical theatre and film adaptations, based on Isherwood’s original stories as well as Van Druten’s play – Cabaret (1966/1972). 

images-20Subsequently, Sally Bowles has been played by a number of wonderful actresses, including Jill Hayworth, Judi Dench, Natasha Richardson, and, of course, Liza Minnelli in Bob Fosse’s film version. This is also a wonderful group of works to examine, which I encourage you to do so – the journey from novels (actually short stories), to the play, to the original musical, to the film, and then to the successful reworking of the musical by Sam Mendes, which is now the accepted and standardized version of the musical.

Sally Bowles has become one of the great iconic dramatic characters of the late-twentieth century. She is representative on a number of things, including at the time Van Druten wrote his play a new expression of feminine sexual desire and behaviour that complement certain revelations in The Kinsey Reports (1948/1953), the first fully detailed and comprehensive survey and analysis of the sexual behaviour of American men and women. Sally Bowles is a free-spirit, a female Dionysius, and part her appeal also resides in a ‘classic’ theatrical legacy and heritage. She falls into a specific character archetype, ‘the good-natured whore’, which has a history, heritage and legacy charting back to the classical Greek and Roman theatre, as exemplified by Thais is the Roman comedy The Mother-in-Law by Terence, to Shakespeare’s Doll Tearsheet and Mistress Quickly in Henry IV Pt 2 (c. 1596), as well as Marston’s The Dutch Courtesan (c. 1604), to Belle Watling in Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With The Wind (1936), beautifully played by Ona Munson in the 1939 film, to La Mome in Can-Can (1954), Irma in Irma La Douce (1956), and Charity in Sweet Charity (1966). I would add Thelma and Roxie from Chicago (1975), but they are not really ‘good-natured’, more femme fatales.

The femme fatales and other female villains – I have to be very careful here as I do not wish to cause any offence. Nonetheless, American theatre in this brief period 1949-154 produced three of the most chilling femme fatales in dramatic literature – Ann Downs in Joseph Kramm’s The Shrike (1952), Abigail Williams in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible (1953), and Rhoda Penmark in Maxwell Anderson’s The Bad Seed (1954). From the world of American cinema it is also possible to add Eve Harrington in All About Eve (1950), and possibly Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard (1950), respectively brilliantly played by Anne Baxter and Gloria Swanson. One could also perhaps add Blanche du Bois in A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), if one places emphasis Blanche’s objective to undermine and remove Stanley. The demonisation of women is literature and drama is as old as as The Bible and other ancient myths. Just as virtually every culture in the world has its Cinderella ‘rags-to-riches’ story, so does every culture have its equivalent of Eve, Lilith, Jezebel, Delilah, Helen of Troy, Medea and Clytemnestra. In American drama in the 1950s the femme fatales ruthless ambition, power and domination have disturbing sociopathic and psychopathic aspects. These complement the general characteristic of something dangerous to life lying hidden under a veneer of social respectability,albeit in this case that threat is also generally directed at a world dominated by men. It’s not only men – there is a few ‘women beware women’ narratives as well, as exemplified by All About Eve but also one of the most unique ‘Westerns’ film ever made, Nicholas Ray’s Johnny Guitar (1954), Johnny_guitarwith Joan Crawford and Mercedes McCambridge locking horns (on film and off) in this extraordinary work that in many ways defies description; its uniqueness further enhanced not only by Harry Strading Snr’s cinematography but also a music score by Vincent Young and Peggy Lee. The witch-hunting parallels with McCarthyims and the HUAC investigations are relatively blatant, as are the lesbian connotations even though never discussed. This too is another element relative to The Pajama Game – of things alluded too, but never actually stated. Witches, sex sirens, and femme fatales occupy quite a significant place in American drama of this 1949-54, and their appearance can be accounted for by this fear verging on hysteria In of being tainted or destroyed by Communism as envisaged by the US government of the time. This stands in marked contrast with today where a femme fatale figure is now realized as a victim, her evil crimes against others justified and given entitlement due to past slight or injury – ‘Let it Go’? – No, I don’t think so. For example, Walt Disney’s film version of The Sleeping Beauty (1959), Sleeping_beauty_disneywhich in many ways is unlike any other Disney film cartoon due to the style of the animation, the evil fairy is called Maleficent. It is a brilliant and highly memorable characterization, voiced by Eleanor Audley with art direction by Marc Davis – and Maleficent is pure unadulterated evil. Maleficent_posterIn 2014 Walt Disney released Maleficent, starring Angelina Jolle. Whilst not wishing to take anything away from Angelina Jolle’s committed and impressive performance, I couldn’t help wondering as I watched this film in which the character of Maleficent is presented in a relatively romantic and sympathetic light as the ‘wronged woman’, that here yet again is another example of a sentimentalising and romanticising of characters that were once upon a time representative of pure evil. When I was growing up a vampire was a vampire, blood-sucking, animalistic, and scary; now the vampire is a hot young guy who is far from scary as he is so understanding, charming and sexy. Same with Maleficent – gorgeous (as played by Angelina Jolle), and another victim with a sense of entitlement – for justifiable revenge. I cant’ help wondering if this is something that should not be encouraged; instead of adding a new perspective that is progressive in a way, aren’t we also reducing something that should remain fearful? Is the logical outcome of all this that no one is evil? Sorry – I don’t buy this. Evil people do exist. Tennessee Williams’ Blanche du Bois says in A Streetcar Named Desire – ‘Deliberate cruelty is unforgivable’, which was and is rather apt for it’s time considering what was being done by Senator Joseph McCarthy, and his cronies, which included Richard Nixon, as well as Roy Cohn who was primarily responsible for the execution of the Rosenberg’s. I like Brecht’s reflective prophecy in regard to Adolf Hitler, and believe it to be true in the light of so much subsequent violence, and the monsters who have instigated it  – ‘Don’t yet rejoice, o world, at his departing / The bitch that bore him is on heat again’.

images-12Streetcar_originalSunsetBoulevardfilmposterAllAboutEveBad-Seed-Posterimages-35

Whilst Miller’s The Crucible continues to be performed, it is quite possible that considering modern tastes and sensibilities that The Shrike and The Bad Seed are simply not-playable, or not ‘box-office’ material. They are both excellent plays, but the femme fatale and villainess characters are so evil in  biblical sense that performing today could bring down the wrath of the feminist Gods upon one. For example, in complete contrast to today’s sentimental nurturing con-noodles in regard to children, and that they are now bred with a massive sense of entitlement – a digression – only today was I told a story by a young teacher how she had to deal with a 10 year old who refused to play ‘Stuck-in-the-Mud’, accusing her that it was a waste of time, it wasn’t ‘fun’, and not the worth the money being paid for the class – now that is scary. (the difference between a lesson being ‘fun’ or ‘pleasurable’ is the subject for another essay). This attitude could ultimately be problematic. All the actresses I have known who have played Abigail in The Crucible have commented on the same thing; a certain moment in the trial scene in Act 3 when you stand there and can feel the audiences hatred like a enormous wave aimed right at you. In this particular moment when the audience is well aware that Abigail is lying, hating the character is quite understandable and in fact desired.This can be extremely disturbing, particularly as most actors really wish to be loved. This particular moment could never be described as ‘fun’. Would a modern young actress feeling vastly superior to Arthur Miller and this old play from 1953 have such a sense of entitlement that she would ask for the scene to be changed or cut? I fear it could happen.  It does take a particular type of actress to pull of this wonderfully diabolic character.  If you ever have the luck to play Abigail, and are challenged by this moment, just remember that if you do experience a wave of hatred coming at from the audience then take as an affirmation that you are doing a good job.

Back to The Bad Seed – this creepy thriller is about a mother who begins to realize that her beautiful daughter is actually a psychopathic killer. Reading this play, and/or watching the film version, I can never be sure if this is meant to be some type of black comedy, nonetheless, originalPatty MacCormack’s performance of Rhoda, which she originally created on Broadway, is in my mind up there with Anthony Perkins’ Norman Bates in Hitchcock’s Psycho (xxxx), Dame Judith Anderson’s Mrs Danvers in Hitchcock’s Rebecca (1940), and Louise Fletcher’s Nurse Ratched in Milos Forman’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo Nest (1975), as the most disturbing and yet brilliant performances of psychopaths and madness; I should also add Heather Ledger’s The Joker The Dark Knight (2008), so unnerving that I either have to look away or leave the room. Watch The Bad Seed – along with Patty MacCormack other members of the original Broadway cast include Nancy Kelly as Rhoda’s mother, and Elieen Heckart as the mother of the child that little Rhoda has brutally murdered – all three give wonderful performances. Furthermore, The Bad Seed completely complements and exemplifies the dominate theme of American drama of this period, that of something secret, corrupt, and perverse undermining the very fabric of American life. That The Bad Seed may now also be seen as a type of black-comedy only adds to its attraction, in that it is possible to see it as almost satiric in its reflection on life in American suffering from the anti-Communist witch-hunts of Senator Joseph MacCarthy and HUAC. Read it, see it – make up your own minds.

Time and space compels me to leap forwards to The Pajama Game. However, I just quickly wish to touch on a couple of other things in this overview of dramatic works from this period. I deliberately have not concentrated on the wonderful plays of William Inge and Tennessee Williams, even though these works heighten and illuminate a new and bold expression of sexual behaviour. These playwrights and their respective plays have received a great amount of literary, academic and dramatic criticism and analysis, and are often and deservedly subject to revivals in the professional and amateur theatre. I am more interested in drawing your attention to the lesser known work of this period, such as The Bad Seed, and Robert Anderson’s Tea and Sympathy (1953).

images-97Tea and Sympathy was one of the most controversial plays performed in this period. Why? Because it was one of the first plays performed on the Broadway main-stage that dealt with the subject of homosexuality. Initially produced by The Playwright’s Company and directed by Elia Kazan, one reason for its success was due to the clever casting of Deborah Kerr, who after the film of The King and I was at the height of her popularity and ‘star power’, as Laura Reynolds, the wife of a high school teacher who assists a young man, Tom Lee, accused of homosexuality. Other notable actresses who also played this character include Joan Fontaine and Ingrid Bergman. The final line of the play, spoken by Laura to Tom, was (and still is) regarded as one of the most poignant final lines written for the theatre – ‘Years from now, when you speak of this, and you will, be kind’.

Whilst Deborah Kerr and other members of the original Broadway cast appear in the 1956 film version, directed by Vincente Minnellii, the film exposes the weakness and sentimentality of the play. There is, however, a wonderful scene between Tom and his jock best friend who is trying to educate Tom how to behave like a man. Originally, this scene has a serious dramatic urgency to it (at least as it appears in the film), now, however, the scene is hilariously funny, rivalling a similar scene performed by Kevin Kline in the film In and Out (1997), or in the play, film and musical versions of La Cage aux Folles (1973/1978/1983/1996). Nonetheless, Tea and Sympathy and the people who first produced it should be honoured for their bravery and risk-taking in presenting this ground-breaking play. Furthermore, it complements what was of the most controversial matters exposed in The Kinsey Reports,  notably the revelation that 10% of the male population were or had had a homosexual experience.

imgres-8images-8images-9imgres

Tea_and_Sympathy_poster

There are two interesting sidelines to all this that does relate to The Pajama Game. images-23The first is that in 1954 Doris Day, who was to later star in the film version had one of her greatest hits with the song Secret Love, which has become a bit of an anthem in regard to homosexuality. Another is how the film version of Tea and Sympathy was advertised. It actually doesn’t really reflect the actual play at all. As will later be revealed this is also an aspect of the original advertising for The Pajama Game. 

In 1954, the same year that saw the premiere of The Pajama Game and The Bad Seed, there was also the first performance of Joseph Hayes The Desperate Hours (1954). Based on a real incident in Pennsylvania in 1952, it is another example of a thriller in which something evil is hidden within a conventional American domestic setting. In this case it is a home invasion by a three escaped prisoners. As with Tea and Sympathy, the film version of The Desperate Hours does not really do the play full justice. This is due a serious error in regard to casting.

imgres-11imgres-10The original stage production featured Karl Malden as the father who needs to outwit the escaped convicts, particularly their psychotic leader, originally played by a young Paul Newman. The film version, however, has the much older Humphrey Bogart as the leader of escaped prisoners playing opposite his contemporary Frederic March. The dynamic contest between a young and older man, as well as the binary complexity of the villain being also charismatically handsome, is lost in the film version of 170px-Paul_Newman_1954The Desperate Hours. The decision not to cast Paul Newman in the film version was apparently due to Humphrey Bogart being considered the bigger ‘star’, and subsequently had greater box-office appeal. CatOnAHotTinRoofHowever, don’t be too distressed as Paul Newman was about to have two of his finest successes in the film version of Tennessee Williams’ 1955 play Cat On A Hot Tin Roof, followed by Williams’ Sweet Bird of Youth (both originally directed by Elia Kazan),  in which Newman appeared with Geraldine Page and Shirley Knight as well as in the subsequent 1962 film version.

Although I have endeavoured to steer clear of Tennessee William’s – I simply ca200px-CaminoRealnt. He is one of my very favourite American playwrights, a true poet of the theatre. 220px-OrpheusDescendingThe 1950s saw the premieres of some some of William’s best work. As well as the work cited above there was also The Rose Tattoo, Camino Real, Orpheus Descending and Suddenly Last Summer. It is perhaps romantic of me but it is difficult to think of another American playwright from this period who still enjoys such a celebrated status with works still being continually produced. Suddenly,_Last_SummerOne reason for this is the powerful female characters that he wrote, and in the time they were written performed by some of the greatest actresses of the time, not least being Elizabeth Taylor.

To balance my section of the great female villains of this time let me quickly glance at three film actress – Elizabeth Taylor, Grace Kelly and Marilyn Monroe. In many ways these three film icons, in the range of characters they portrayed in the 1950s, which is quite considerable, are representative of the new American woman as figured in the Kinsey Reports. They a representative of a new type of female heroine, one projected a conscience awareness and confidence in their sexuality, appeal and womanhood.

Diana Vreeland, legendary fashion columnist for Harper’s Bazaar  (1936-62) and editor-in-chief of Vogue (1963-71) is credited with saying that Elizabeth Taylor is one of the greatest actresses of the twentieth century. Why?250px-Taylor,_Elizabeth_posed-1 Because no other ‘Hollywood’ actress has challenged herself as much as Elizabeth Taylor in the range of roles she has done. Although not always successful, nonetheless, when one looks at Dame Elizabeth Taylor’s body of work it definitely supports Diana Vreeland’s belief; from child actress in Lassie Come Home (1943) and National Velvet (1944), to dutiful and beautiful young woman in Little Women (1949), Father of the Bride (1950) and A Place in the Sun (1953), devoted wife in Giant (1956), to sex goddess in Raintree County (1957), Cat of a Hot Tin Roof (1958), Suddenly Last Summer (1959), Butterfield 8 (1960) and Cleopatra (1963), to drunken harridan is Whose Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966), and a truly wonderful Kate in Franco Zefferelli’s film version of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew (1967). From Lassie to A Place in the Sun to Cleopatra to Whose Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Yep – I agree with Diana Vreeland – the range is extraordinary.

Whilst there are many highlights, I would  like to point out one film from this 1949-54 period that is relevant to this essay about American drama in the age of McCarthyism, HUAC and The Kinsey Report – and that is George Steven’s A Place in the Sun, loosely based on the novel An American Tragedy (1925) by Theodore Dreiser. 220px-A_Place_in_the_Sun_(film)_posterElizabeth Taylor was still in her teens when she made this film and it was her first major success as an adult actress. In this film she appeared opposite Montgomery Cliff, the first of three major films she would do with him – the others being Raintree County and Suddenly Last Summer. Space does not permit me to dwell too much on Montgomery Cliff, except to acknowledge him has one of the best actors of his generation. In this film he plays a young man lured by the wealth and beauty and status offered by the Elizabeth Taylor character, enough to him to murder his pregnant former girlfriend, played by Shelley Winters. The acting in this film is superb (yes – it’s in Black and White), and the sheer on-screen physical beauty and grace of Taylor and Cliff is ravishing to behold. However, as with other dramas of this period there is something rotten and corrupt in the midst of this world, and that is the character played by Montgomery Cliff. Taylor-Clift-A_Place_in_the_SunHis physical beauty and charismatic appeal is like Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Grey, but it is merely a shell. What lies underneath is a ruthless ambition to achieve the idealized high status of an ‘American dream’ for which he will commit murder in or to achieve it. As Stephen Sondheim and John Weidman explored in their brilliant Assassins (1990), this is the perverse side to that sacred doctrine written by Thomas Jefferson that lies in the opening section of the Declaration of Independence (1776) – ‘the pursuit of happiness’. What makes this a conundrum is that ‘happiness’ is a very difficult to define as it is so personal. If it is my constitutional right to be happy, then does this justify the killing of another in order to achieve ‘happiness’. Highly debatable, controversial and challenging, yet nonetheless, this inherent right to ‘the pursuit of happiness’ lies at the very heart of virtually all American drama.

Grace_Kelly_1956220px-Dial_M_For_MurderGrace Kelly – ice maiden. I don’t mean that in a nasty way as I have far too much respect for Grace Kelly’s acting and charismatic appeal. Grace Kelly was in her early twenties in 1952 when her film career took off with High Noon (1952), arguably one of the best ‘Westerns’ ever made (yes – another film in Black and White). This was quickly followed by an incredible string of successes – John Ford’s Mogambo (1953), George Seaton’s The Country Girl (1954), for which she won an Academy Award for Best Actress, imgres-1imgresthenRear_Window_film_poster Hitchcock’s Dial M for Murder (1954), Rear Window (1954), and To Catch a Thief (1955), and finally Cole Porter’s High Society (1956), with Bing Crosby, Frank Sinatra, and Celeste Holm. Later that year, at the age of 26, she married Prince Rainer III of Monaco and never acted again.

The characters that Grace Kelly played in the 1950s, whilst never completely cold, nonetheless, they were quite self-righteous and moralistic; even if this code of ethics was quite different and unique to her character. If not ‘cold’ then let say she was the epitome of 1950s feminine ‘cool’, and like Elizabeth Taylor, full of ‘grace’. I will elaborate on this issue of ‘grace’ a bit further later on, but I do not think it difficult to grasp. Suffice to say that I mean it in a classical Renaissance way, which is more associated with a sense of effortless and ease – ‘sprezaturra’ as set forth in Baldassarre Castiglione’s The Book of the Courtier (1528). Cary Grant, when asked who was his favourite leading lady nominated Grace Kelly, due to her ‘serenity’. It tantamount to the same thing as ‘sprezaturra’ – a sense of ‘grace’.

images-4267px-Rearwindow_trailer_2Gracerear220px-To_Catch_a_Thief3

200px-High_Noon_posterWhilst the three films that Grace Kelly made with Alfred Hitchcock are probably the ones that are her most watched, and I can’t help thinking that Raymond Burr’s murderer in Rear Window bares a striking resemblance to a bespectacled Joseph McCarthy, nonetheless, I wish to highlight the first film that drew her public attention – Fred Zimmerman’s High Noon (1952).  This popular and critically acclaimed film has been called one of the greatest ‘Westerns’ ever made – and I agree. When I have attempted to excite and enthuse a younger audience to this simply wonderful film, however, I have failed. Invariably the cry is ‘It’s too long’, ‘There’s too much talking’ etc (oh, and yes – ‘Not another Black and White film?!’ – what is this eversion of ‘Black and White’ films?). High Noon is a taunt psychological ‘western’, as oppose to a ‘shoot ’em up’ action-packed film that is more modern fare. THigh_Noon1he tension steadily rises from the beginning, following a classical tragedy device of the entire action occurring in one day and beginning with celebratory event, in this case Gary Cooper’s marriage to Grace Kelly, to a thrilling show-down with a tragic ending. The characters that Gary Cooper and Grace Kelly play don’t die, although they come close, but the true tragedy is the exposure of the moral and ethical worthlessness of a community that had effectively abandoned their previous protector (Gary Cooper) leaving him to face his fate alone. This is registered in the final moments of the film when Gary Cooper tosses his sheriff’s  badge to lie in the dirt at their feet. It is not difficult to see that underneath this lies a contemporary critique of the abandonment of morals, ethics, loyalty and friendship due to fear and intimidation.

What makes this film important in regard to Grace Kelly is that it sets up her film persona of the loyal wife and co220px-GraceKellyHighNoonTrailerScreenshot1952mpanion, a characteristic that is relative in all her subsequent films. This loyalty is dramatically challenged but survives – ‘serenity’. A romantic ideal, perhaps -but nonetheless her characters individual strength througimagesh love, intelligence, bravery and rock-steady perseverance stands in contrast as a figure of hope in this period when such things were being domestically and international under intensive fire. She is also stunningly beautiful, and immaculately dressed. I use ‘beautiful’ here as a descriptor not in a superfical way but how Michael Chekhov uses it to define one of the essential elements of all great art, and that is that there is a sense of grace and ‘serenity’ and strength.

 s-l1000Whilst Grace Kelly may be considered as a’Blonde-Venus’, nonetheless, the true ‘Blonde-Venus’ of the period is Marilyn Monroe. I am a huge fan and admirer of Marilyn Monroe, not only as an iconic movie star but also as an incredibly talented actress. She also possesses something that only a very few actors are blessed with – something that Stanislavsky acknowledged (and lacking in him) as ‘Stage-Charm’. This is a particular type of gift and one that doesn’t necessarily have talent, yet nonetheless, has a powerful magnetic appeal. For example, one of the great ‘beauties’ of the late-nineteenth century was Lily Langtry who was not celebrated for her acting talents, which was from all accounts not that great. Lily Langtry, however, was one of the most popular actresses of the time, primarily due to her beauty and charm. With Marilyn Monroe not only is their great beauty and a radiating charm, there is also considerable talent.

The 1950s is Marilyn’s decade; the body of work is wonderful – virtually ever single film is terrific to watch, and even if it may now seem very old fashioned and ‘stagey’, nonethelessmarilyns, whenever Marilyn appears the film rises in quality and movie magic. For example, The Prince and the Showgirl (1957) based on the 1953 play The Sleeping Prince by British playwright Terence Rattigan. The brainchild of Laurence Olivier the film featured some of Britain’s finest actors including Dame Sybil Thorndike for whom George Bernard Shaw wrote his Saint Joan (1924). As with other films there were problems with Marilyn’s professional consistency, which infuriated Olivier and others associated with the production. However, Dame Sybil saw something else, apparently stating ‘Just watch – that young girl wi220px-My_Week_with_Marilyn_Posterll act us all off the screen’ – and she was right. Despite the high calibre of British actors, who at times are rather self-consciously stagey, especially imgresOlivier, this is Marilyn’s film. The recent film My Week with Marilyn (2011) is a bio-pic that involves the filming of The Prince and the Showgirl with a terrific performance by Michelle Williams as Marilyn, however, if you wish to have what is perhaps an even more accurate impression of the real Marilyn Monroe then read Truman Capote’s ‘A Beautiful Child’, which is an account of a day he spent with Marilyn in New York and was published in his Music for Chameleons (1980).

There are so many Marilyn Monroe films of the 1950s that I could rave on about, not least being The  Asphalt Jungle (1950), All About Eve (1950), Monkey Business (1952), Don’t Bother to Knock (1953), Niagara (1953), How to Marry a Millionaire (1953), River of No Return (1954), There’s No Business Like Show Business (1954), The Seven Year Itch (1955), Bus Stop (1956), and Some Like it Hot (1959). I particularly admire her for her decision in 1955 to leave Hollywood, and in an attempt to re-invent herself enrolled in Lee Strasberg’s Actor’s Studio. To re-invent oneself is one of the greatest challenges any artist must face. It is a frightening but necessary leap into the dark, one that is essential if you are to grow and develop as an artist and one I hope I have the courage, strength and perseverance to do as I enter this new chapter of my life. Marilyn Monroe successfully achieved this, as evident in her beautiful performance in images-3Bus Stop (1956), as did another from an earlier period, the Australian actress Nellie Stewart who when her singing career suddenly ended went on to become a dramatic actress. The artists who successfully go through this metaphoric change are sources of inspiration to me. One scene in Bus Stop that is particularly interesting is when Marilyn performs the song ‘Black Magic’ – badly. As her musical films testify Marilyn was a good singer, albeit in her own unique way. What is challenging for any singer is can they deliberately sing badly. Well, of course, they can – but would they? In Bus Stop Marilyn blasts apart her singing reputation that is both funny and painfully embarrassing. It is also incredible brave. This leads to another matter in regard to Marilyn Monroe, which is that it takes an intelligent actress to successfully pull off the ‘dumb blonde’ persona.

Whilst there have been numerous others both before and after, Marilyn stands as the quintessential ‘dumb blonde’. Her comic timing is excellent, as exemplified in Bus Stop, The Seven Year Itch, as well as How to Marimgresry a Millionaire and Some Like it Hot. I’m not going to talk about Some Like It Hot, although arguable it is one of the best film comedies ever made, as well as certainly falling into the subject matter of this essay of an exploration of sHowtomarry1ecrets and what lies beneath a surface truth – and then some. In How to Marry a Millionaire there are a couple of terrific moments that also exemplify Marilyn’s comic ability and timing; such as when she takes off her glasses and being basically blind without them bumps into walls. Having the talent and ability to perform comedy should never be under-estimated as it is actually quite difficult. The great English actor, David Garrick (1717-79), believed that whilst most are capable of performing drama but the measure of a ‘real actor’ was their ability to play comedy, and subsequently be successful in both forms – it still is in my mind.

In her life-time Marilyn Monroe’s film persona was often considered ‘vulgar’. This is primarily due to her overt sexuality and sensuality – which she was – with abundance. That she could send up her own beauty in such films like Bus Stop and How to Marry a Millionaire, as well as The Prince and the Showgirl  is for me further evidence of her greatness as an actress. She is an icon – not only as a ‘Hollywood ‘star’, but she is also representative of new version of ‘the good natured whore’ archetype dramatic character. Furthermore, along with Elizabeth Taylor, Grace Kelly (amongst others, including Lauren Bacall and Doris Day) she is also representative of a new confidence in American woman, touched on in  Kinsey’s Sexual Behaviour of the Human Female (1953). Marilyn Monroe, however, or rather her erotic screen persona, can be and was also regarded as a threat to the conventual 1950s marriage-bed, as according to Kinsey approximately 50% of married men had at one time or another experienced extra-marital sex. That she was in some way subversive of the ideal American 1950s marriage can also be seen in another essential characteristic of p2360_p_v7_aaMarilyn Monroe – her sense of humour, complementing George Orwell’s notion that laughter is like a ‘little revolution’. If there was one film that encapsulates these two elements I would choose Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953)images-31, which incidentally also falls somewhat into a ‘Court Room Drama’. The brazen and radiant sexuality, as well as mischievous humour of Marilyn’s Loreli Lee, as well as Jane Russell’s Dorothy Shaw, is both delightfully shocking and audaciously subversive. This is encapsulated in Marilyn Monroe’s version of the song ‘Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend’, which has become representative of Marilyn Monroe.

Loreli Lee can also be seen as prefiguring other similar characters, such as Truman Capote’s Honey BreakfastAtTiffanysGolightly in Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1958), which was also made into an iconic film in 1961 starring Audrey Hepburn, albeit in a much watered down version of Capote’s original noimgres-9vella. Himages-1owever – back to Marilyn. Most actors are not remembered beyond their own life-time – it would seem, however, that Marilyn is still of significant importance and relevance to the modern imagination and sensibilities.Her iconic status not only as a ‘movie star’, but also the ‘Blonde Venus’ of the 1950s (if not the 20th Century) is exemplified215px-Breakfast_at_Tiffanys by the numerous images of her that have appeared after her death in 1962, something that is shared by very few others, and continues to this day. For example, the portraits images-2by Andy Warhol, one of which I have placed at the beginning of this section on Marilyn. There is also the often repeated image from The Seven Year Itch of Marilyn standing over a subway air vent, which Ken Russell referenced in a quasi-religious manner in his film Tommy (1975).

There is not the time and space for a similar consideration of new idealised and romanticised sexuality of the American male in the 1950s. Nonetheless, let me at least reference Montgomery Cliff, Marlon Brando, Paul Newman, James Dean and Elvis Presley – that should be enough. When discussing acting in the twentieth century, how it has changed, evolved and developed, I often refer to the 1950s as marking a turning point. If Laurence Olivier is held as representative of the popular and sexually idealised male actor for the first half of the twentieth century, then Marlon Brando can be seen as representing the second half. Brando’s images-25electrifying performance in Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar Names Desire, which he first performed on the Broadway stage in 1947 when he was 23 years old, and then the film version in 1951, marks a considerable shift in regard to a subsequently popular and accepted idealised male sexual persona, as well as a change in acting methodology and approach. In regard to the question ‘What Lies Beneath?’, in the case of Brando and Streetcar there is a rapacious, dominant220px-James_Dean-cigarette-fullt sexual animal that was perhaps matched only by Clark Gable in the previous decades. Complementing Kinsey’s Sexual Behaviour in the Elvis_Presley_promoting_Jailhouse_RockHuman Male (1948), particularly in regard to revelations of homosexual appeal, desires and activities, it is somewhat significant that Brando, as well as James Dean and Elvis Presley, continue to appear in modern popular homosexual as well as heterosexual iconography.

I must move on to the final Part of this rather extended essay. However, there are still a number of things I wish to mention in regard to this lengthy overview. This period, 1949-1954, saw a number of highly successful film musicals, many of them being version of successful Broadway musicals, such as Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein II’s Show Boat (1951), Lerner and Lowe’s Brigadoon (1954). Original work, written specifically for film, include An American in Paris (1951) , Singin’ in the Rain (1952), The Bandwagon (1953), Calamity Jane (1953) and Seven Brides for Seven Brothers (1954). Significantly, and complementing the issue of secrets that lie beneath a surface, Singin’ in the Rain complements the dominant theme of this period, of secrets hidden under a surface veneer, with the Debbie Reynolds’ character, Kathy Selden, being the hidden voice for Jean Hagan’s silent movie star vixen with a rotten voice, Lina Lamont.

215px-An_American_in_Paris_poster220px-Singing_in_the_rain_posterThe_Band_Wagon_poster

220px-Seven_brides_seven_brothers

220px-A_Star_Is_Born220px-Calamity_Jane_poster

In regard to American film there is also Robert Rosen’s Academy Award winning Best Film All The King’s Men (1949), Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole (1951), Douglas Sirk’s Magnificent Obsession (1954), John For220px-All_the_King's_Men_(1949_movie_poster)d’s She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949), Wagon Master (1950), Rio Grande (1950), The Quiet Man (1952), What Price Glory? (1952), John Houston’s The African Queen (1951), William A, Wellman’s The High and the Mighty (1954), as well as Jack Arnold’s The Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954) that are also concerned with something lying underneath a surface, literally as well as figuratively and symbolically. Somewhat a bit of a tangent, but it is to me curious that in this modern era of remakes that of all the old horror films there has not (as yet?) been a remake of The Creature from the Black Lagoon, one of the most popular films of this period.

220px-Poster_-_Quiet_Man,_The_01220px-The-african-queen-1-220px-Creature_from_the_Black_Lagoon_poster220px-The_High_and_the_Mighty_poster220px-Ace_in_the_Hole_(movie_poster)imgres-18

ThirdManUSPosterMeanwhile, internationally there is from the U.K. there is Ca220px-Kind_Hearts_and_Coronetsrol Reed’s The Third Man (1950), as well as four great Ealing Stu250px-The_Lavender_Hill_Mobdio comedies featuring Sir Alec Guinness – Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949), The Lavender Hill Mob (1951), The Man in the White Suit (1951), and The Ladykillers (1955); from Italy there is Roberto Rossellini’s S220px-Man_in_the_white_suittromboli (1950), Frederico Fellini’s La Strada (1954); from France there is Jean Renoir’s Le Fleuve (The River) (1951) and Le Crosse D’Or (The Golden 220px-The_Ladykillers_posterCoach) (1953), and from Japan there is Akira Kurosawa’s Scandal (1950), Rashomon (1950), and The Idiot (1951), and also (complementing The Creature from the Black Lagoon), there is Godzilla (1954), created by Tomoyuki Tanka, Ishiro Honda and Eiji Tusbarya. All magnificent films in their own individual and unique way.

220px-Stromboli_poster220px-La_Strada_Poster220px-La_Fleuve_1951_film_poster220px-Goldencoachposter220px-Hakuchi_poster220px-Shubun_poster.imgresWhilst I think that all are essential viewing, there are  five American films and one Japanese film that are personal favourites and complement and exemplify this essay’s topic of secrets and what lies beneath – Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950), Joseph L. Mankiewicz’s All About Eve (1950), Fred Zinnerman’s From Here to Eternity (1953), Akiro Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai (1954), Elia Kazan’s On the Waterfront (1954), and (sneaking this one in) John  Ford’s The Searchers (1956). 

SunsetBoulevardfilmposter220px-AllAboutEve220px-From_Here_to_Eternity_film_posterimages-43On_the_Waterfront_poster220px-SearchersPoster-BillGold

But wait – there’s more…..(pant, pant)….

The 1949-54 period is also extraordinary in regard to literature, exemplified by the following pieces of fiction. For just the years 1953-54 American novels included – Richard Bissell’s Seven and Half Cents (1953), which is adapted to become The Pajama Game in 1954, Ray Bradbury’s Farenheit 451 (1953), William S. Burfahrenheit-451-211x350roughs’ Junky (1953), Saul Bellows’ The Adventures of Augie MJunkie_(William_S._Burroughs_novel_-_1953_cover)arch (1953), James A. Michener’s The Bridges at Toko-ri (1953), Ernest K. Gann’s The High and the Mighty (1953), Ira Levins’ A Kiss Before Dying (1953), Raymond Chandler’s The Long Goodbye (1953), Davis Grubb’s The Night of the Hunter (1953), Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend (1954), Gore Vidal’s Messiah (1954), Mac Hymans’ No Time for Sergeants (1954), and James A. Michener’s Sayonara (1954). Meanwhile from Britain there is IaAugiemarchn Fleming’s first and secMich_bridges_1st_edond James Bond novels Casino Royale (1953) and Live and Let Die (1954),  L. P. Hartley’s The Go-Between (1953), John Wyndham’s The Kraken Wakes (1953),  C. S. Lewis’ fourth and fifth novels of the Narnia chronicles The Silver Chair (1953), which is my personal favourite, and The Horse and His Boy (1954), Agatha Christie’s A Pocketful of Rye (1953), J. R. Tolkein’s The Fellowship of the Ring (1953) and The Two ToweGoTellItOnTheMountainrs (1954), William GolHigh&Mightyding’s Lord of the Flies (1954), Kingsley Amis’ Lucky Jim (1954), Iris Murdoch220px-BonjourTristesse‘s first novel Under the Net (1954), and Enid Blyton’s Five Go To Mystery Moor (1954). Also, from France there was Francoise Sagan’s Bonjour Trieste (1954). 

KissBeforeDyingMessiah_(Vidal_novel)220px-NightOfTheHunter220px-IAmLegend25028RaymondChandler_TheLongGoodbyeMich_sayonara_1st_edCasinoRoyaleCoverLive_and_Let_Die_first_edition_novel_coverimgresThekrakenwakesA_Pocket_Full_of_Rye_First_Edition_Cover_1953TheSilverChair(1stEd)TheHorseAndHisBoy(1stEd)FellowshipOfTheRingThe_Two_Towers_(novel)_-1st_edition_cover220px-LordOfTheFliesBookCover220px-LuckyJimUnderTheNet220px-Famous-five-13-1954-1

All the above mentioned novels were international best-sellers and award winners. Many were turned into 220px-Fahrenheit451Bsuccessful movies, including Francois Truffaunt’s 1966 film adaptation of Fahrenheit 451,  Charles Laughton‘s extraordinary interpretation of The Night of the Hunter 215px-Nightofthehunterposter(1955), and Joseph Losey’s The Go-Between (1971) with a screenplay by Harold Pinter. What is also perhaps significant in regard to modern film sensibilities and tastes is that whilst the James Bond film syndication continues as strong as ever, and C. S. Lewis’ Narnia chronicles and Tolkein’s The Lord of The_Go-Between_UK_posterthe Rings have also successfully made the leap into the twenty-first century, partly due to film adaptations, as has William Goldings’ The Lord of the Flies, which is still a common novel to be found on secondary schools curriculum, the surprising modern connection may be for some Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend, However, Richard Matheson’s powerful 1954 science-fiction novel has been adapted three times for film – The Last Man on Earth (1964) with Vincent Price, The Omega Man (1971) with Charlton Heston, and I Am Legend (2007) with Will Smith. You should try and find out more about Richard Matheson as he was a modern-day pioneer in many ways, not least because of his collaboration with Rod Sterling, writing numerous episodes to The Twilight Zone, which to my mind still remains as one of the most unique series ever written for television. Furthermore, his 1971 short story ‘Duel’ was adapted by Richard Matheson for television and was Stephen Speilberg’s first film.

220px-IAmLegend25028220px-Lastmanonearth1960s220px-The-Omega-Man-Poster220px-I_am_legend_teaser

This entire overview is merely the tip of the iceberg. It is enough, probably more than enough, to strengthen my argument that this period of 1949-1954 is truly remarkable in regard to American drama. Hopefully, you will not feel overwhelmed, but intrigued and encouraged to seek out, read and/or watch some of the work that I have cited. Just start anywhere – and if you are not enjoying it then move on to something else. The point is to just start – I don’t think will be disappointed.

I have only one more work to mention in regard to this period 1949-54. Whilst American drama was dealing with its own sense of fear, paranoia and guilt, supported and complemented by a growing affluent society and burgeoning new understanding and expression of sexual behaviour, meanwhile across the Atlantic, in Paris, there was the premiere of a new play whose influence would challenge and change all previous notions of contemporary theatre – Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. 

WaitingForGodotBeckett wrote Waiting for Godot between 1947-49 when he was in his early 40s, but it was not produced until 1953. Its subsequent impact and influence on the international theatre scene, as well as literature, was incredible and vast, and is something we are still trying to comprehend and understand. That play was Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Eventually, it became to be regarded as one of the quintessential plays that exemplified the new ‘Theatre of the Absurd’. Waiting for Godot may prefigure ‘the theatre of despair’, which Noel Coward labelled John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger (1956), but I don’t find it absurd – baffling, theatrical, incomprehensible at times – but not absurd. On the contrary, I find it all to wonderfully real and human. If it is to be considered as absurd, then it is just as absurd as musical theatre, which has people suddenly sing about their feelings. That is even sometimes even more absurd if it is not justified by the actors. Whatever you think and/or feel about Waiting for Godot it impact world-wide has been considerable to the extent that in the ever evolving state of the theatre and dramatic literature, nothing would ever be the same after Godot – and it wasn’t. It is in many ways a complete subversion of conventional theatre. Subsequently, it is very much a product of its time. It is to this issue of subversion, particularly in regard to The Pajama Game that I will address in the third and final part of this essay.

***

Part 3: The Pajama Game

The Pajama Game opened at the St James Theatre in New York on May 13, 1954. Based on Richard Bissell’s 1953 novel Seven and a Half Cents the musical was created and produced by what is now considered Broadway royalty – Jerry Ross and Richard Adler (Music and Lyrics), George Abbott and Richard Bissell (Bo200px-ThePajamaGame2006ok). George Abbott was also the director, with Jerome Robbins, whilst the choreographer was Bob Fosse. It subsequently won the Tony Award for Best Musical for 1954, as well as Tony Awards for Carol Haney (the original Gladys) for Best Supporting Actress, and Bob Fosse for Best Choreography. It has been revived numerous times, the most recent being in 2006 with Harry Connick Jnr playing Sid, and is considered a ‘classic’ of the American musical theatre.

Part of its appeal is the brilliant score by Jerry Ross and Richard Adler, which includes “Hey There’, Steam Heat’, and ‘CLOONEYHernando’s Hideaway’. The high calibre of the score, and these three songs in particular, was immediately recognised by contemporary recording artists such as Rosemary Clooney, Johnnie Ray, Archie Bleyer anjohnnie_ray__hernandos_hideaway_ic001_596d Sammy Davis Jnr. Rosemary Clooney’s version of ‘Hey There’ was a #1 hit and Archie Bleyer’s version of ‘Hernando’s Hideaway’ a  #2 hit on the 1954 Billboard pop charts. My personal favourite is Johnnie Ray’s version of ‘Hernando’s Hideaway’. The success of these respective versions aided in their ascendency to be included in the canon of ‘The Great American Songbook’. The 1957 film version of The Pajama Game staring Doris Day and most of the original cast, including John Raitt and Carol Haney, as well as the old vaudeville star Eddie Foy Jnr for whom the role of Hines was specifically crafted, cemented the popularity of the show.

On one level The Pajama Game is a delightful, fun and lively piece of entertainment. However, look a little closer, scratch a little deeper and one finds what lies beneath its entertaining surface is something rather satiric, subversive, and very sexy. Although it draws on a number of influential musical resources, such as a psychologically based soliloquy song (‘Hey There’), which had been developed particularly by Rodgers and Hammerstein (e.g.. the King’s ‘Soliloquy’ in The King and I and Billy Bigelow’s ‘Soliloquy’ in Carousel), nothing really quite like The Pajama Game existed prior, with the possibly exception of the musicals of Cole Porter, particularly in regard to the expression of sexual desire and play, as well as a highly successful comic expression of aggressive and dangerously obsessive jealousy. The overt expression of sex and sexual desire is extraordinary for its time, and yet simply marvellous as there is nothing smutty or vulgar, everything is shot through with a dazzling wit and charm. Subsequently, it demands a delicate balance in performing. Play just the surface, and despite the fast-paced farcical energy it will seem superficial, meaningless and just plain silly. Play it with too much psychological realism and it will become heavy and dull. Too much either will make the characters unsympathetic, dull and boring. From a modern perspective none of the characters are particularly likeable. Casting is all important. Babe and Sid, for example, do not have a lot to really deal with in establishing their relationship. Both characters begin with a fierce denial of love, yet within a couple of scenes are already well and truly involved. Furthermore, Sid can all too easily come across as a sullen boorish bully, whilst Babe in Act One is an industrial terrorist. These roles, the central ‘lovers’ in this strange romantic comedy, demand the charisma of a Doris Day and jock-masculinity of a John Raitt.

215px-ThePajamaGame1954With The Pajama Game nothing is quite what it seems – beginning with the poster. The original poster for The Pajama Game was highly successful, attracting attention, and was re-produced numerous times, as evident in the album cover for Johnnie Ray. However, as with the poster for the film of Tea and Sympathy the original poster for The Pajama Game is actually deceptive and a bit misleading. It shows a group of men ogling an attractive demure young woman in state of semi-undress, wearing only the top half of a pair of pajamas, her shoulders and top of her breasts exposed. However, nothing like this actually exists in the show. Fimages-39urthermore, even though this may be fanciful, I can’t help thinking of a young Norma Jean (Marilyn Monroe) when I look at this cartoon young woman. Also, with the strong red back-ground and the particular shaping of the cartoon figures and the title is suggestive of an inverted version of the national flag for the Soviet Union. Maybe the Soviet flag was a source of inspiration? After all, central to the plot of The Pajama Game is a threatened strike by the workers at the local pajama factory. Who knows? Nonetheless, what this should alert one to is that nothing is what it may seem to be and that underneath the surface, in this case a type of vulgar sexual ogling and voyeurism, something else is operating.

This issue is also curiously present in the journey of the title page of the original Richard Bissell novel.

images-367½_Cents,_coverbissell pajama book cover

The first version with the original title has a small semi-undressed female cartoon figure, but it is the yellow tape-measure that dominates the graphic picture, This is a working tool placing the industrial strike being of primary significance.

The second version is after The Pajama Game had opened, the title to Richard Bissell’s novel now being reduced to one sensational word – ‘PAJAMA’!!!. In this case it is the issue of sexual desire and behaviour that is primary. It is not certain as to who the female figure may be – it could be either Babe or Gladys. Due to the suggestion of denim overalls that she seems to have partly removed I’m betting that this is meant to be Babe, and indeed in the original novel Babe is far more aggressive and overt than in the musical. The red, as a symbol for passion, is used deliberately, particularly the provocative use of red lipstick and an open mouth. The female figure, however, seems completely indifferent, and rather self-obsessed. She could be using her compact mirror to see how the male figure is reacting, but by its angle and her gaze she seems to be examining her lips and lipstick. The male figure, probably Sid, but it could be Hines, is also curiously posed. Rather than ogling at this voluptuous beautiful babe, he has his eyes closed. He is holding in his left hand a set of keys and could be looking at them, which suggests he is Sid. There is a sexuality in the graphic, but it is not directed at another person. Neither figure seems particularly interested in the other, which is not the reality of The Pajama Game. As for the title, ‘PAJAMA’, it is difficult to see how this is reflected in the graphic design. A more appropriate title (with a nod to Stendhal’s The Scarlet and The Black) would be ‘THE LIPS AND THE KEYS’.

The third version is also post-musical, adopting the original cartoon graphic but minus the distinguishing red background. As previously mentioned, this impression is misleading as this type of voyeurism is absent from The Pajama Game, and is actually more appropriate to Promises, Promises and How To Succeed In Business, Without Really Trying. Furthermore, in a somewhat self-deprecating manner the blurb on the title page, ‘The original book of the famous musical hit’, effecting placing the original novel in a lower status to the musical. Curious.

Let’s now focus on some of the songs.

First, Babe’s ‘I’m Not at All in Love’ and Sid’s ‘Hey There’. What is remarkably different from other contemporary musicals is that here we have two characters who are in denial, their respective first major songs are about not wanting to fall in love. Babe’s ‘Im Not at All in Love’ is a bright buoyant jocular number between her and her female colleagues, very much in the Rodgers and Hammerstein vein like ‘Wash That Man Right Out Of My Hair’ from South Pacific. Sid’s ‘Hey There’, however, is something a bit different.

There is precursor to this song, Sid’s very first song ‘A New Town is a Blue Town’ that feels a little like Sky Masterson’s ‘My Time of Day’ from Frank Loesser’s Guys and Dolls (1950). This is not surprising considering that ‘A New Town is a Blue Town’ was actually written by the uncredited Frank Loesser. It prefigures ‘Hey There’ in that it reveals a psychological depth, a disturbance in his inner life, that is unusual from conventional musical theatre prior to The Pajama Game, which is further developed in ‘Hey There’.

‘Hey There’ is haunting and beguiling so it’s little wonder that this became one of the stand-out songs from the show. Despite the lilting charm it is not a pretty song. In its dramatic context this song has a psychological depth that is self-deprecating to the point of self-loathing as Sid castigates himself for being attracted to Babe. For most of the song ‘Hey There’ follows the musical theatre convention of a soliloquy, very much like those found in Rodgers and Hammerstein’s The King and I and Carousel, but then something magical happens. The dictaphone he has been using responds to him. It is no longer a solo but a duet, a dramatic debate between two voices, two Sid’s, with the second voice dominating the final moments of the song. This is unique. Furthermore, this is the type of song, especially at the top of show, that is generally given to the female protagonist. Very rarely is the male lead given such an emotionally psychological song that exposes such intense vulnerability.

Having rehearsed, directed and produced The Pajama Game a few times,  as well as worked on scenes and songs in Masterclasses, including ‘Hey There’, it always works best (at least in rehearsal) when the two Sid’s actually confront each other physically and emotionally on-stage. Such a process is extremely useful for the actor playing Sid, as the dramatic dynamic is much greater playing off another actors rather than a dictaphone.

Although, as Shakespeare states, ‘comparisons are odious’, nonetheless, for me ‘Hey There’ is like Rodgers and Hammerstein meets Rodgers and Hart. Whilst the dramatic device of a soliloquy for the male protagonist is something, as previously stated, that Rodgers and Hammerstein developed to new heights, the wistful, reflective melancholy of ‘Hey There’ is something that resonates with such Rodgers and Hart songs such as ‘Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered’ from Pal Joey (1940) , ‘‘Falling in Love With Love is Falling for Make Believe’ from The Boys from Syracuse (1938). These songs, however, are for the mature female character in their respective musicals. Perhaps a closer comparison, and possible influence, would be Cole Porter’s ‘So in Love’ from Kiss Me, Kate (1948), which is sung first by Lily and then reprised by Fred, similar but reversed re gender with ‘Hey There’, which is first sung by Sid and reprised by Babe. Also, like ‘Hey There’, ‘So in Love’ is a song that in its dramatic context is full of self-loathing. Further comparisons are Stephen Sondheim’s ‘Send in the Clowns’ from A Little Night Music (1973), which like ‘Hey There’ has been recorded by numerous singing artists, and is also in its dramatic context not a pretty song but one that is full of lacerating self-loathing. Another more modern equivalent is ‘People Like Us’ from Andrew Lippa’s The Wild Party (2000). ‘Hey There’, however, is very much a Richard Adler and Jerry Ross song. Furthermore, for the most part the above referenced songs essentially belong to the respective female protagonists, and despite Rosemary Clooney, as well as Doris Day, making it a hit, in it’s dramatic context ‘Hey There’ is Sid’s song. What is more, as previously stated, it is for two sides of a masculine id that are in conflict with one another due to sexual and emotional desire – very Dr Kinsey.

Sid and Babe’s relationship is further developed throughout Act One, primarily through song as in the respective scenes they are generally in conflict. Their first major duet, ‘Small Talk’, takes place in the evening in the living room of Babe’s home. It is a delightful, flirtatious song that is like a game, complementing the title of the show. However, what is a little disconcerting is that the so-called ‘Small Talk’ that triggers the song is the possible factory workers strike. ‘Small Talk’? Nonetheless, what it does reveal is how little jock-boy Sid regards this industrial dispute that is central to the whole show in his passionate pursuit of Babe. The song concludes with a romantic kiss – but what happens next? We return to the factory where Sid and Babe sing their second duet, ‘There Once Was A Man’.

‘There Once Was A Man’ is a mad-cap ‘country & western’ romp that, from my experience if the show, audiences simply go wild about. For years it has baffled me as to what is it about this song that causes such a heightened reaction. There Once Was A Man’ is unlike anything else in the show, which is not so surprising as, like ‘A New Town is a Blue Town’, it was written by Frank Loesser. The oddness of the song is heightened by it’s placement in the sequence of events. Coming straight after ‘Small Talk’ and the romantic kiss that concludes the previous scene, as well as being a continuation of Sid and Babe’s game-playing, it feels that it belongs more in the bedroom than at the factory. It is a sexy and sexual song – think ‘Bollywood’ – in that Sid and Babe are role-playing in this wild song, something that they logically wouldn’t necessarily do in a public place. That the film has Doris Day and John Raitt sing this song in the evening on a deserted street as Sid drops Babe off at her place is indicative that the movie makers were also not convinced that the given circumstances of the factory setting as per the original show was the right location. Despite the movie’s shift in location it still doesn’t make sense to place it in the street in the evening. It is such a noisy playful song you’d think the neighbours would complain – ‘What are you two doing?’ ‘Get a room!’. A private room, a bedroom, is the more logical place for such sexual role-playing. I said, ‘Think Bollywood’, and a mean it – as ‘There Once Was A Man’ can easily be seen as a substitute to actual sexual intercourse. Furthermore, it presents sexual role-playing/intercourse as something that is joyous and heaps of fun. Thank the Lord! What is wonderful is that there is no sense of guilt or shame about all this sexual role playing, which is something that is very much the artistic and imaginative truth of this world of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. It’s as if the sense of guilt and shame that accompanied contemporary sexual behaviour as revealed in The Kinsey Reports has been deleted and removed and that such sexual game-playing and behaviour is rather something that is celebratory and lots of fun. This is something that is heightened in the two major ensemble numbers, ‘Once A Year Day’ and ‘Hernando’s Hideaway’.

‘Once A Year Day’ is the Act One ensemble number that is part of the sequence of events associated with the annual Sleep-Tite factory picnic. It is a romp – literally and figuratively. Look very closely at the lyrics. Under the veneer of social respectability of a annual social picnic there seems to be a hell of a lot of sexual game-playing and intercourse going on, more like a frenzy Dionyistic orgy.

Babe          Look at Charlie up a tree                                                                                                         Kissing Katie’s ear                                                                                                                     Charlie’s wife is sore as hell!

Chorus       Oh well, it happens once a year!

…………..

Poopsie       Look at Papa Halterbush,                                                                                                         92 today                                                                                                                                   Running off with Sadie Lee

Chorus        He’s heading for that pile of hay!

What is being said and sung is by modern censorious sensibilities and conservative tastes is so ‘politically incorrect’ that it is baffling to me no one leaves the theatre in shocked disbelieve at the open and celebrated licentious behaviour of these outwardly wholesome American citizens of Cedar Rapids. Instead people laugh and giggle. Remember what Orwell said about laughter – that it was like a little revolution’? Could it be that because these respectable citizens feel no guilt or shame that either do we when we experience this joyous and celebratory number? Or do we just go ‘blank’, we hear it but we don’t react or take offence? It’s like those moments in High School productions of Sweet Charity and Chicago when there is line with definite sexual overtones, such as ‘I don’t pop my cork for every guy I meet’, and parents face go stoney for a second, and then its over with the faces now saying,’We didn’t hear that’, ‘That never happened’. Hilariousimgress. What ever the case – you decide – but do look closely at these lyrics. What is being said and sung is so delicioulsy titilating, and so completely subversive to contemporary as well as modern morals and ethics that any accusation that The Pajama Game is just simply and ‘old fashioned’ musical means that the person who says it hasn’t actually listened to what is being said and sung and are merely expressing a superficial opinion. Or maybe its denial? ‘Oh! Dr Kinsey!’

These same respectable citizens are also those who patronise that ‘dark secluded place / A place where no-one knows your face – “Hernando’s Hideaway” – Ole!’. This popular song is a tango, one of the sexiest dances ever invented by mankind. The tango first appeared in the nineteenth century in Buenos Ares and Montevideo in the nineteenth century, and whilst there a number of sources and influences, including drums and rituals associated with African slaves and ‘Candcombe’ music from Uruguay, Argentinian ‘candcombe’ was and is a male-dominated domain – as was the origins of the tango. It was originally a dance performed by two men. However, that is a digression. In The Pajama Game it is used to characterise ‘Hernando’s Hideaway’, a local nightclub to which Gladys takes Sid, as he pursues her to gain the key to the safe at the Sleep-Tite Factory.

I know a dark, secluded place
A place where no one knows your face!
A glass of wine, a fast embrace
It’s called Hernando’s Hideaway, Ole!

All you see are silhouettes
And all you hear are castanets
And no one cares how late it gets
Not at Hernando’s hideaway, Ole!

At the Golden Finger Bowl or anyplace you go
You will meet your Uncle Max and everyone you know
But if you go to the spot that I am thinking of
You will be free to gaze at me and talk of love
Just knock three times and whisper low
That you and I were sent by Joe
Then strike and match and you will know
You’re in Hernando’s hideaway, Ole!

The association with Dionysius and Bacchanalia behaviour lies in ‘a glass of wine, a fast embrace’, Dionysius being not only the God of the ancient Greek theatre but also the God of